2000
DOI: 10.1017/s1742758400017793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Helicoverpa Armigera (Hübner) Diet on Its Parasitoid Campoletis Chlorideae Uchida

Abstract: A study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that the quality of host plant parts determines the nutritional quality of herbivorous insects feeding on it to their parasitoids. A Gossyphim hirsutum-Helicoverpa armigera-Campoletis chlorideae tritrophic system was evaluated. The superior nutritional quality of bolls and young leaves of Gossyphim hirsutum (MCU-5 variety) contributes to more efficient feeding, growth and reproduction of the bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) and better survival of its larval … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parasitic wasps are particularly sensitive to changes in the nutritional quality of their hosts, as host-parasitoid relationships are usually quite intricate (Godfray, 1994). Sublethal effects of Bt proteins on the host larvae (sick host) may reduce their nutritional quality for the parasitoid, and poor nutritional quality of the host results in detrimental effects on the development and survival of the natural enemies (Nordlund et al, 1988;Murugan et al, 2000). This can be due to a poor host quality or due to reduction in host population (which is the goal of the Bt crops).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parasitic wasps are particularly sensitive to changes in the nutritional quality of their hosts, as host-parasitoid relationships are usually quite intricate (Godfray, 1994). Sublethal effects of Bt proteins on the host larvae (sick host) may reduce their nutritional quality for the parasitoid, and poor nutritional quality of the host results in detrimental effects on the development and survival of the natural enemies (Nordlund et al, 1988;Murugan et al, 2000). This can be due to a poor host quality or due to reduction in host population (which is the goal of the Bt crops).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be due to a poor host quality or due to reduction in host population (which is the goal of the Bt crops). Sublethal effects of Bt proteins on the host larvae (sick host) may reduce their nutritional quality for the parasitoid, and poor nutritional quality of the host results in detrimental effects on the development and survival of the natural enemies (Nordlund et al, 1988;Murugan et al, 2000). However, these prey quality-mediated effects are less likely for predators (Romeis et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This along with the fact that C. chlorideae can be reared in the laboratory and is relatively well studied (e.g. Nikam and Gaikwad, 1991;Murugan et al, 2000) makes it a possible candidate for risk assessment studies. Only a few predatory arthropods are reported from chickpea (Mehto et al, 1986;Singh et al, 1990) (Fig.…”
Section: Possible Effects Of Insect-resistant Gm Chickpeas On Entomopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sublethal doses of Bt toxins may also reduce the nutritional quality of the insect host, which has been shown to result in negative effects on the development and survival of some natural enemies (Nordlund et al. 1988; Murugan et al. 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%