Influence of harvest dates on sugar beet quantitative traits

Ćurčić, Živko; Danojević, Dario; Čačić, Nikola; Nagl, Nevena; Taški-Ajduković, Ksenija; Kovačev, Lazar

doi:10.5937/ratpov49-1197

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our opinion, probably because the changes in the variances of investigated effects are result of different environmental conditions in 2017, characterized with hot and dry summer, typical for the Pannonian plane. It is likely that increased genotype x environment interaction was mostly due to different reaction of tested hybrids to water deficit (Pidgeon et al, 2006) Similarly to previous studies of Wolf (1995), Bloch and Hoffmann (2005), and Ćurčić et al (2012), there was no interaction between genotypes and HD, indicating that in autumn different sugar beet hybrids have very similar root development.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 58%

Effect of Sugar Beet Genotype, Planting and Harvesting Dates and Their Interaction on Sugar Yield

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Climate changes are affecting the plant production, including sugar beet growing especially in the southern and central parts of the Europe. Modifying the sowing and harvesting dates are one of the most often used adaptations in sugar beet cultivation. The aim of this study was to assess the interactions between planting date and sugar beet genotypes for different harvest dates with recommendation for duration of vegetation period for specific hybrids in order to achieve the best performance and to evaluate influence of climatic factors on sugar yield. Three-way analysis of variance and AMMI (Additive main effect and multiple interactions) analysis were performed to investigate interaction between main factors. Analysis of variance revealed that genotypes (G), planting date (PD), harvest date (HD) and interaction G × PD significantly affected sugar yield in 2016. In 2017 genotypes, planting date, harvest date and G x PD interaction significantly affected sugar yield on probability level of 1%, while PD × HD interaction had significant effect on probability level of 5%. Results of AMMI analysis enabled discrimination of genotypes with the highest level of stability in certain planting dates. Hybrids with combined yield and sugar content (NZ type) should have the advantage in earlier planting dates compared to of sugar beet hybrids with higher sugar content (Z type). However, in shortened vegetation period Z type hybrids are more stable and with better sugar yield results. Results of our study suggest that delaying the harvest date decreases differences between sugar yields obtained from hybrids sown in different planting dates. Major factors in the study affecting sugar yield were growing degree days, insolation and number of days from planting to harvest.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 58%