2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of grit blasting treatment using steel slag balls on the subsurface microhardness, surface characteristics and chemical composition of medical grade 316L stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in this figure, all the blasting treatments were able to increase the hardness of the surface and subsurface layers of the specimen. This finding confirmed the results obtained in previous works with other mechanical surface treatments [10][11][12][13]15]. Interestingly, the shot-blasting treatment conducted in this research was able to produce the specimen with the hardest surface and subsurface layers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As can be seen in this figure, all the blasting treatments were able to increase the hardness of the surface and subsurface layers of the specimen. This finding confirmed the results obtained in previous works with other mechanical surface treatments [10][11][12][13]15]. Interestingly, the shot-blasting treatment conducted in this research was able to produce the specimen with the hardest surface and subsurface layers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As also noted previously, blasting particles with angular shapes cause surface material loss or erosion by a cutting mechanism when impacting the blasted surface [16,17]. In agreement with these previous reports, the irregular surface morphology and sharp edges of both the silica particles and the slag balls indented, gouged and even removed some of the surface material [11], which ultimately led to the formation of a rough surface layer. The microhardness distributions across the specimens' sectional area are demonstrated in Figure 4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations