The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2010.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of grazing on soil water and gas fluxes of two Inner Mongolian steppe ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
18

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…). Figure 4 illustrates C 2 and C 3 values for individual samples of the tested treatments and relates them to the classes of k a as schematically introduced by Reszkowska et al (). Here, a differentiation between both treatments becomes clearer by pore continuities classified as “very high” for most of CaO samples (75%) in contrast to NIL and REF samples which represented C 2 values from “very low” to “high” range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). Figure 4 illustrates C 2 and C 3 values for individual samples of the tested treatments and relates them to the classes of k a as schematically introduced by Reszkowska et al (). Here, a differentiation between both treatments becomes clearer by pore continuities classified as “very high” for most of CaO samples (75%) in contrast to NIL and REF samples which represented C 2 values from “very low” to “high” range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Ball et al () defined three continuity indices ( C 1 , C 2 , C 3 ) [Eqs. (3), (4), (5)] based on the formulations of Groenevelt et al () and further used, e.g ., by Reszkowska et al (), Dörner et al () or Uteau et al (). true C1 = Ds D0 θa , true C2 = ka θa , true C3 = ka θa 2 . …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Radford et al (2009), Betteridge et al (1999, and Broersma et al (1999) have reported increased soil compaction with high grazing intensity caused by the mechanical stress exerted on soil by grazing animals (Zhou et al 2010). Both Rezkowska et al (2011a) as well as Krümmelbein et al (2009) reported that grazing of semi-arid steppe soils also reduced soil water pore volume and saturated soil hydraulic conductivity. The reduced soil hydraulic conductivity was attributed to destruction of macropores (Reszkowska et al 2011b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Soil compaction influences pore size distribution, its geometry, gas and water fluxes and, consequently, plant growth (Lipiec and Hatano, 2003;Dexter et al, 2008). In general, soil compaction decreases the contribution of large pores, total porosity, increases that of fine pores, and affects the pore continuity and the anisotropy of fluxes (Wójciga et al, 2009;Reszkowska et al, 2011). Agricultural machinery traffic can form an anisotropic soil pore system due to simultaneous movement of aggregates or particles forward and downwards and wheel slippage (Pagliai et al, 2003;Peng and Horn, 2008;Horn and Peth, 2011).…”
Section: Soil Compactionmentioning
confidence: 99%