2018
DOI: 10.1149/2.0431811jes
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Graphene Oxide Content on the Zn-Gr Composite Layer Prepared by Pulse Reverse Electro-plating

Abstract: The Zinc (Zn)-graphene (Gr) composite layer was prepared successfully by using a pulse reverse electro-plating method on the iron substrate. Effect of GO content in the electrolyte on the microstructures of the composite layer and the corrosion behaviors in the 3.5 wt% NaCl solution were also investigated in detail by using scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and a series of electrochemical measurements. The results revealed that: 1) GO can be reduced into Gr during the co-deposition of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results reveal three facts, that is, (1) the Gr sheets provided additional nucleation sites and resulted in small and dense grains, which changed the original homogeneous nucleation into heterogeneous nucleation during electrodeposition; (2) Gr also hindered the grain growth; (3) excessive GO sheets in the electrolyte decreased the content of the Gr-reinforcing phase in the coating due to agglomeration and poor dispersion and weakened the enhancement effect. In fact, the phenomenon of the “optimal Gr adding content” in the metal–Gr composites has been confirmed by many research studies. ,,, …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results reveal three facts, that is, (1) the Gr sheets provided additional nucleation sites and resulted in small and dense grains, which changed the original homogeneous nucleation into heterogeneous nucleation during electrodeposition; (2) Gr also hindered the grain growth; (3) excessive GO sheets in the electrolyte decreased the content of the Gr-reinforcing phase in the coating due to agglomeration and poor dispersion and weakened the enhancement effect. In fact, the phenomenon of the “optimal Gr adding content” in the metal–Gr composites has been confirmed by many research studies. ,,, …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It is well known that Zinc (Zn) and Zn-based alloy coatings, involving zinc–cobalt (Zn–Co), zinc–nickel (Zn–Ni), zinc–chromium (Zn–Cr), zinc–copper (Zn–Cu), and zinc–iron (Zn–Fe), provide economical ways to enhance the anti-corrosion performance of iron and steel, which has been employed in industry widely. In recent years, in order to enhance the corrosion resistance of thin coatings in harsh environments, many composite coatings have been developed for meeting challenging applications. , As we all know, compared with their bulk materials, nano-sized materials have a significant large surface area to volume ratio and therefore, nanocomposite coatings have been widely explored for applications . Correspondingly, various nanomaterials have been used as reinforcing phases for preparing the composite coatings in the field of electrodeposition, such as zinc–nickel alloy–cerium oxide (Zn–Ni alloy–CeO 2 ), zinc–nickel alloy–aluminum oxide (Zn–Ni alloy–Al 2 O 3 ), zinc–nickel alloy–silicon nitride (Zn–Ni alloy–Si 3 N 4 ), zinc–titanium oxide (Zn–TiO 2 ), zinc–nickel–phosphorus alloy–silicon carbide (Zn–Ni–P alloy–SiC), nickel–phosphorus alloy–tungsten carbide (Ni–P alloy–WC), zinc–nickel alloy–carbon nanotubes (Zn–Ni alloy–CNTs), nickel–reduced graphene oxide (Ni–rGO), and zinc–graphene (Zn–Gr). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, XRD of samples was performed to characterize the microstructures of the products with and without Sm 3+ . As shown in Figure B­(c), the peak at 2θ = 10.1° corresponds to the (001) facet of the GO . The interlayer spacing between GO sheets is about 8.8 Å according to the Bragg equation.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As shown in Figure 3B(c), the peak at 2θ = 10.1°corresponds to the (001) facet of the GO. 24 The interlayer spacing between GO sheets is about 8.8 Å according to the Bragg equation. However, the peak shifts to 2θ = 9.8°after adding DPDPP into the GO [Figure 3B(b)], which indicates that the interlayer spacing is slightly increased (9.1 Å).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%