2003
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.419-422.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Grain Boundaries on Plastic Deformation in Pure Mg and AZ31 Mg Alloy Polycrystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first effect indicates the strong dependence of the contribution of twinning in compression on the grain size. The latter effect has also been reported by Ono et al [24] who explain it by solution strengthening due to aluminium. Post -stress relaxation effects [25] also indicate that solid solution strengthening due to aluminium is important for the deformation behaviour of AZ alloys.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The first effect indicates the strong dependence of the contribution of twinning in compression on the grain size. The latter effect has also been reported by Ono et al [24] who explain it by solution strengthening due to aluminium. Post -stress relaxation effects [25] also indicate that solid solution strengthening due to aluminium is important for the deformation behaviour of AZ alloys.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…After hot rolling, the grain size of AZ31 is generally of the order of 10 to 40 m, [7,8,9] with sizes closer to ϳ5 m reported in some instances. [10,11] If the grain size of the AZ31 billet received for use in the present work (ϳ380 m) is typical (and our experience suggests that it is), grain refinement by a factor of 10 to 80 times commonly occurs during hot rolling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[16][17][18] First, the strong dependence of both parameters on orientation texture affects r o and k in opposite directions. [9,19] Second, both parameters depend on the deformation mode (slip or twinning) and, therefore, on the proportions of each, [20][21][22][23] this being especially important in pure Mg. [24][25][26] Third, the strain at which the yield strength is determined [10,27,28] can depend on the individual investigator. Fourth, solid solution effects on both r o and k are important and are yet to be quantified, as explained in more detail below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%