2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of glacier type on bloom phenology in two Southwest Greenland fjords

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…might have prevented deep-water nutrients entering the necessary water-depth for phytoplankton growth. Similar stratified conditions are today created in fjords with land-terminating glaciers, for example, Ameralik fjord and the Young Sound, where meltwater runoff increases stratification that limits the summer bloom (Meire et al, 2017;Sejr et al, 2022;Stuart-Lee et al, 2023). In addition to changes in meltwater discharge, alterations in the glaciers grounding line depth and ocean heat content can also control the influence of subglacial plumes (Carroll et al, 2016).…”
Section: Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatologymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…might have prevented deep-water nutrients entering the necessary water-depth for phytoplankton growth. Similar stratified conditions are today created in fjords with land-terminating glaciers, for example, Ameralik fjord and the Young Sound, where meltwater runoff increases stratification that limits the summer bloom (Meire et al, 2017;Sejr et al, 2022;Stuart-Lee et al, 2023). In addition to changes in meltwater discharge, alterations in the glaciers grounding line depth and ocean heat content can also control the influence of subglacial plumes (Carroll et al, 2016).…”
Section: Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatologymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In early September, productivity in Nuup Kangerlua has declined from its summertime peak (Juul‐Pedersen et al., 2015; Meire et al., 2017). In Ameralik, the high turbidity within the fjord through summer (e.g., at 1 m depth for AM10 in 2019: 6.8 mg L −1 in May, 16.0 mg L −1 in August and 9.2 mg L −1 in September, Stuart‐Lee et al., 2023), combined with observations of residual nitrate in the inner‐fjord (up to 1.5 μM), suggests a low‐light, low‐productivity environment where photochemical bleaching is limited and in‐fjord formation of marine CDOM is also limited compared to the other glacier fjords discussed herein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No direct comparison of LpPb and total particulate Pb in the same samples is available, but if particle lability did not change over the timescale of particle additions to the fjord, the values herein are at least consistent and would suggest LpPb accounts for roughly 5–60% of total Pb for Kongsfjorden particles. Near‐surface (0–20 m) suspended particle loads in Ameralik and Nuup Kangerlua in September 2019 were 6.09 ± 0.93 mg L −1 and 5.30 ± 0.38 mg L −1 , respectively (Stuart‐Lee et al., 2023). Combined with a mean LpPb suspended particle content of 113 nmol g −1 measured in Ameralik (Table 1), LpPb is approximately present at a mean concentration of ∼0.7 nmol in Ameralik.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations