1992
DOI: 10.1002/jqs.3390070204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of glacier hydrology on the dynamics of a large Quaternary ice sheet

Abstract: The influence of glacier hydrology on the time-dependent morphology and flow behaviour of the late Weichselian Scandinavian ice sheet is explored using a simple onedimensional ice sheet model. The model is driven by orbitally induced radiation variations, icealbedo feedback and eustatic sea-level change. The influence of hydrology is most marked during deglaciation and on the southern side of the ice sheet, where a marginal zone of rapid sliding, thin ice and low surface slopes develops. Such a zone is absent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only limited areas in eastern Norway are affected by a C TP-ELA drop of 1000 m based on the present atmospheric circulation pattern, and larger-scale glacierization is initiated along the main watershed towards Trøndelag and along the watershed between Gudbrandsdalen and Østerdalen only with a C TP-ELA lowering of 1500 m ( Figure 5). An asymmetric icesheet buildup is hence likely based on the evaluation of modern ELA-related terms, being in accordance with recent models of the Fennoscandian ice sheet (e.g., Boulton et al, 2001;Arnold and Sharp, 2002). It is therefore necessary to foresee a major change in circulation patterns to explain a large-scale ice-sheet buildup localized in central southern Norway without previous large-scale buildup from the western mountains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Only limited areas in eastern Norway are affected by a C TP-ELA drop of 1000 m based on the present atmospheric circulation pattern, and larger-scale glacierization is initiated along the main watershed towards Trøndelag and along the watershed between Gudbrandsdalen and Østerdalen only with a C TP-ELA lowering of 1500 m ( Figure 5). An asymmetric icesheet buildup is hence likely based on the evaluation of modern ELA-related terms, being in accordance with recent models of the Fennoscandian ice sheet (e.g., Boulton et al, 2001;Arnold and Sharp, 2002). It is therefore necessary to foresee a major change in circulation patterns to explain a large-scale ice-sheet buildup localized in central southern Norway without previous large-scale buildup from the western mountains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…While surface water is discussed as a potential source term in some of these studies, it was not explicitly included in ice-sheet drainage models until the work of Arnold & Sharp [58] (see §6). A surface-to-bed hydraulic connection is generally assumed to transmit water in sufficiently large quantities that some efficient drainage system at the ice-bed interface would be required for its evacuation.…”
Section: Early Models From Groundwater Hydrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although similar in its aims, the model of Arnold & Sharp [58,168] (figure 7b) attempts to represent efficient and inefficient drainage beneath the Scandinavian ice sheet, as well as allow for surface water as a source to the basal drainage system. The latter is computed and routed over the ice-sheet surface, whereupon it is injected directly to the bed if a prescribed threshold discharge Q crit is reached and the bed is temperate.…”
Section: (A) Ice-sheet Hydrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the SME on the development of the Eurasian ice sheets has previously been investigated in oneand two-dimensional models (Arnold and Sharp, 1992Sharp, , 2002. Using a map-plane model, Arnold and Sharp (2002) applied a water-pressure-dependent sliding law to derive velocity changes on the Scandinavian ice sheet in response to subglacial configuration and varying sensitivity to supraglacial meltwater discharge.…”
Section: Previous Modelling Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%