2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of geometry, elasticity properties and boundary conditions on the Mode I purity in sandwich composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…47,50,54 It is generally agreed that a bi-material interface such as the sandwich skin-core contact leads to the coupling of normal and shear deformations. 47,48,54,55,57 Similar findings were published by Burlayenko et al, 77 who studied the debonding behaviour of sandwich structure with glass fibre reinforced epoxy composite facesheets and PVC foam cores using the DCB and SCB method. Experimental and finite element analysis showed that the SERR were significantly higher using the DCB method, which they attributed to considerable Mode II fractions involved.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…47,50,54 It is generally agreed that a bi-material interface such as the sandwich skin-core contact leads to the coupling of normal and shear deformations. 47,48,54,55,57 Similar findings were published by Burlayenko et al, 77 who studied the debonding behaviour of sandwich structure with glass fibre reinforced epoxy composite facesheets and PVC foam cores using the DCB and SCB method. Experimental and finite element analysis showed that the SERR were significantly higher using the DCB method, which they attributed to considerable Mode II fractions involved.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In addition to its Mode I dominance, the SCB method exhibits only a minimal tendency of crack kinking into the core, which was found by several authors. 39,78,83 Burlayenko et al 77 even established a negative shear stress at the crack tip using the SCB method, which would result in a crack propagation towards the actual skin-core interface or even to the facesheet. In order to provide consistent and reproducible GI values using the SCB test method for sandwich composites, Ratcliffe and Reeder 41 proposed specific constraints regarding the specimen and the testing procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of the FE model and the computational task can be reflected by a number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) equal 82 026. The stress state and strain energy release rate along the initial delamination front were determined based on linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) [14]. Simulations of the ELS test in the case of coupled laminates enabled distinction of the most problematic couplings from the point of view of a proper calculation of SERR in accordance with the ISO 15114 Standard [11]..…”
Section: Fem Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sandwich panels, the main role of the core is in transferring shear forces between the face sheets when the panel is subject to bending. The intensive loading conditions to which sandwich structures are subjected might produce the skin/core debonding [7][8][9][10][11] and crack kinking propagation in the core region [12][13][14]. Regarding the crack kinking propagation in the core region, the assessment of the elastic and fracture properties of PVC foams is an essential prerequisite to correctly implement a numerical model, which will be able to simulate deviation of crack trajectory from the initial direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%