2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of geometrical factors on steam ejector performance – A numerical assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eames et al [14] confirmed that the nozzle exit position (NXP) and primary nozzle geometry had a strong influence on the entrainment performance. Varga et al [15] and Rusly et al [16] also observed that the position of the nozzle was an important design parameter, and the nozzle exit position affected the critical back pressure considerably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eames et al [14] confirmed that the nozzle exit position (NXP) and primary nozzle geometry had a strong influence on the entrainment performance. Varga et al [15] and Rusly et al [16] also observed that the position of the nozzle was an important design parameter, and the nozzle exit position affected the critical back pressure considerably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The co-efficient of the performance of ERS is directly proportional to the entrainment ratio of the ejector (Ruangtrakoon et al 2011). The geometry and the operating conditions of the ejector influence the entrainment ratio (Varga et al 2009). The effect of operating conditions on the performance of the ejector is relatively well established when compared with the geometrical effects (Ruangtrakoon et al 2013;Varga et al 2009;Sankarlal & Mani, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometry and the operating conditions of the ejector influence the entrainment ratio (Varga et al 2009). The effect of operating conditions on the performance of the ejector is relatively well established when compared with the geometrical effects (Ruangtrakoon et al 2013;Varga et al 2009;Sankarlal & Mani, 2005). The most influencing geometrical parameters over the performance of ejector are the area ratio (ratio of the area between constant area mixing chamber to primary nozzle throat), the primary nozzle exit position, the convergent angle of the constant pressure mixing section, and the length of constant area mixing section (Eames et al 2007;Jia & Wenjian, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For these reasons, ejector refrigeration systems can be used in buildings, in distributed tri-generation systems and for the waste heat recover from industrial processes (Ben Mansour et al, 2014;Godefroy et al, 2007;Little and Garimella, 2011). Nevertheless, the ejector refrigeration has not been able to penetrate the market because of the low coefficient of performance (Sarkar, 2012): this is because the efficiency of the whole system is highly influenced by ejector performances, which significantly depends on the geometry, working fluid and operating conditions (Kasperski and Gil, 2014;Selvaraju and Mani, 2006;Varga et al, 2009a;Yapıcı et al, 2008). This paper deals with the screening of the working fluids, using a validated lumped parameter model, in the range of operating conditions of low grade energy sources (waste heat and solar energy sources).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%