2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-013-2005-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of gap size on carbon and nitrogen biogeochemical cycling in Northern hardwood forests of the Upper Peninsula, Michigan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
23
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, soil microbial community at fine scale was determined by plant community including proximity of tree and understory plants (Pennanen et al., ), while soil microbial community at the micro scale was shaped by roots, organic particles, and soil structure (McIntosh et al., ). In contrast to previous studies (Arunachalam & Arunachalam, ; Lewandowski et al., ; Schliemann & Bockheim, ), the gap size in our study is relatively smaller. On the other hand, soil microbial community exhibits great seasonal shift and yearly fluctuation (Lewandowski et al., ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…For example, soil microbial community at fine scale was determined by plant community including proximity of tree and understory plants (Pennanen et al., ), while soil microbial community at the micro scale was shaped by roots, organic particles, and soil structure (McIntosh et al., ). In contrast to previous studies (Arunachalam & Arunachalam, ; Lewandowski et al., ; Schliemann & Bockheim, ), the gap size in our study is relatively smaller. On the other hand, soil microbial community exhibits great seasonal shift and yearly fluctuation (Lewandowski et al., ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the biomass of herbaceous vegetation decreased gradually from the gap centre to under the closed canopy, and the k values at the different transverse positions in alpine forest understory were ordered as follows: closed canopy (186%) > gap edge (133%) > gap centre (131%). Parameters related to the morphology and structure of herbaceous vegetation, such as the leaf‐area index, diversity index and multidimensional scaling (Jain et al ., ; Seidlova et al ., ; Schleppi et al ., ), are influenced by microclimatic factors such as light, temperature and throughfall (Schliemann and Bockheim, ). The pattern in the WHC observed here was similar to that described previously for the LAI from the gap to the canopy (Soudani et al ., Eriksson et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Closed canopy areas of mature, conifer forests in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan have been shown to exhibit greater nitrogen mineralization rates than open, forest gaps (Schliemann and Bockheim ). And, while N mineralization rates increase with elevation in the mountains of the southern Appalachians (Garten and Van Miegroet ), at elevations above 700 m, there is increased variance among areas of differing vegetation, with significantly higher N mineralization rates occurring in areas where evergreen shrubs are absent—an indication that vegetation can differentially affect N mineralization in these ecosystems (Knoepp and Swank ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%