2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of gap size on wind damage variables in a forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…During the last decade several studies focused on estimation of clear-cutting and thinning effects on wind and turbulent exchange within atmospheric boundary and surface layers (e.g. [15][16][17][18][19]). In relation to forest microclimate such studies are very important because the turbulence regime is one of the main factors determining thermal and moisture status of ground surface and the atmospheric surface layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decade several studies focused on estimation of clear-cutting and thinning effects on wind and turbulent exchange within atmospheric boundary and surface layers (e.g. [15][16][17][18][19]). In relation to forest microclimate such studies are very important because the turbulence regime is one of the main factors determining thermal and moisture status of ground surface and the atmospheric surface layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 4 x/ ht gap size in the simulation did not have any re-circulation (any negative horizontal velocity, or reverse flow, would have shown up as white) within the clearing, in fact no recirculating effects were output downwind of a stand, which agrees with simulations by Panferov and Sogachev (2008). At heights of 0.4 h x , the simulations by Panferov and Sogachev (2008) reported no reverse flow in gaps at 1.7 and 6.1 tree heights in length.…”
Section: Horizontal Wind Velocitysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This is contradictory to other studies which do show similar peaks of TKE between one and two tree heights (eg. Frank and Ruck, 2008;Panferov and Sogachev, 2008;and Foudhil et al, 2005) and then report a noticeable decrease above two tree heights (Frank and Ruck, 2008;and Foudhil et al, 2005), in both their simulations and observations.…”
Section: Comparison Of Flow Traits With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Model equations and details about numerical schemes and boundary conditions can be found in Sogachev et al (2002). It should be noted however, that the model is capable to describes separately the mean and gust loads on trees which allows more exact evaluation of possible wind damage cause and of high risk areas within the stand (Panferov and Sogachev, 2008). The estimation of critical loads leading to overturning or breakage of trees is described in details in Panferov et al (2009Panferov et al ( , 2010.…”
Section: Wind Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%