2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.10.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of frequency of the excitation magnetic field and material's electric conductivity on domain wall dynamics in ferromagnetic materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coercive decreases from 0.724 to 0.423 as the frequency f decrease from 2.5 × 10 −5 Hz to 0.833 × 10 −5 Hz, meanwhile, the remnant magnetizations are not affected. Such a simulation result agrees well with previous experimental reports [44][45][46].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The coercive decreases from 0.724 to 0.423 as the frequency f decrease from 2.5 × 10 −5 Hz to 0.833 × 10 −5 Hz, meanwhile, the remnant magnetizations are not affected. Such a simulation result agrees well with previous experimental reports [44][45][46].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Figures 7 and 8 show the MBN profiles for the samples PA_2 and PA_M2, in which peak value of the fitted profiles first increases and then decreases with frequency of the excitation field, and it is highest when frequency equals 50 Hz for both the samples. It is evident as there is optimum frequency at which the signal has maximum strength because MBN signal, according to Faraday's law, is given as v MBN = −nS dB dt , where B = o (H + M) is magnetic induction field, and the peak value depends upon two factors: the rate of change of magnetic field intensity dH dt = 2 fH a cos(2 t * ) , which increases with frequency as H a , which is the amplitude of the magnetic field intensity, is constant and the rate of change of magnetization dM dt ∝ (domain wall velocity) , which decreases with frequency due to proportional increase in coercive field of the pinning sites as a result of induced eddy current in the specimen [27,29]. The peak occurs before t* < 0.5 for all the samples that is along the path f-a in B-H curve (refer Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Frequency On the Mbn Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Pérez-Benítez model [26], the MBN is produced by the interaction of domain walls with defects, where the coercive field of these defects follows a Gaussian distribution function. Chávez-González et al [27] also proposed a model based on [26], but also took eddy currents into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As frequency-mixing is generated in the nonlinear interaction between two magnetic fields and the magnetic microstructure, the excitation parameters for the two magnetic fields inevitably influence the performance of magnetic frequency mixing detection given the same test ferromagnetic material [12][13][14]. Burdin et al [15] analyzed the influence of the frequency and amplitude of the high-frequency magnetic field on frequency mixing effect by experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%