Volume 1: Turbomachinery 1986
DOI: 10.1115/86-gt-234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Free Stream Turbulence and Blade Pressure Gradient on Boundary Layer and Loss Behaviour of Turbine Cascades

Abstract: The optimization of the blade surface velocity distribution is promising a reduction of turbine cascade losses. Theoretical and experimental investigations on three turbine cascades with the same blade loading show the important influence of the blade pressure gradient and the free stream turbulence on the loss behaviour. The results presented demonstrate that it is the boundary layer transition behaviour that determines the losses on turbine cascades. An enormous effort in measuring technique is required in o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No clear correlation was found, either by correlating against centre of pressure, or against the location of the point of peak velocity. Previous investigations, Hashimoto and Kimura (1984), and Hoheisel et al (1986), have concluded that aft-loading is preferable, although at similar conditions to the 'flap tests' (low inlet turbulence, low Mach Number) there was not much difference. For our additional 'flap tests' (described later), where inlet wakes were present, aft-loading did appear to give less loss.…”
Section: Diffusion Factors and Loading Distributionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…No clear correlation was found, either by correlating against centre of pressure, or against the location of the point of peak velocity. Previous investigations, Hashimoto and Kimura (1984), and Hoheisel et al (1986), have concluded that aft-loading is preferable, although at similar conditions to the 'flap tests' (low inlet turbulence, low Mach Number) there was not much difference. For our additional 'flap tests' (described later), where inlet wakes were present, aft-loading did appear to give less loss.…”
Section: Diffusion Factors and Loading Distributionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…If the injection of coolant had caused an earlier laminar to turbulent boundary layer transition, and in so doing prevented the formation of a separation bubble, this could reduce the overall loss. Indeed, Hoheisel et. al.…”
Section: Results -Individual Rowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant headway has been made during the past decade towards the reduction of LPT airfoil counts through high-lift airfoil designs. Initial research on the aerodynamics of more highly loaded LPTs appears to have been based on the family of T104-T106 airfoils developed by Hoheisel et al [3]. This family includes airfoils with both front and aft loading having values of the non-dimensional Zweifel coefficient, Zw, of about 1.04 to 1.07.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%