2011
DOI: 10.2980/18-3-3445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of forage biomass and cover on deer space use at a fine scale: A controlled-density experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forbs have a higher net digestible energy than grasses and are the main dietary component of the Anticosti deer diet in summer (Huot ). Our results are supported by studies on habitat use demonstrating a positive association between deer distribution and plant biomass (Stewart et al , Rothley , Coulombe et al on Anticosti Island). Female deer on Anticosti Island selected both open habitats and peatlands at the habitat‐patch scale in summer (Massé and Côté ) but increased their use of forested area in late summer and autumn (Massé and Côté ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Forbs have a higher net digestible energy than grasses and are the main dietary component of the Anticosti deer diet in summer (Huot ). Our results are supported by studies on habitat use demonstrating a positive association between deer distribution and plant biomass (Stewart et al , Rothley , Coulombe et al on Anticosti Island). Female deer on Anticosti Island selected both open habitats and peatlands at the habitat‐patch scale in summer (Massé and Côté ) but increased their use of forested area in late summer and autumn (Massé and Côté ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…On Anticosti Island, negative effects of density on body mass and fat reserves appeared stronger in habitats with low plant biomass, that is, high proportion of balsam fir stands or low proportion of open habitats. With increasing density, deer were also documented to trade‐off their use of dense‐canopy habitats for open habitats where plant biomass was greater, likely to minimize the effect of competition on body condition (Anticosti: Coulombe et al , Québec mainland: Rouleau et al , and Norway: Nilsen et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to ibex, red deer might have abandoned part of their anti-predator behaviour as they can be observed grazing, resting and ruminating on the alpine meadows of the Trupchun valley during daytime [ 67 , 68 ]. However, besides the absence of predators and limited disturbance, finding ungulates foraging in open areas with higher plant biomass could also be an effect of high population densities [ 100 ]. When forage availability in habitats with more protection declines with increasing population numbers, the animals might be forced to use more open terrain for foraging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the recent increase in habitat selection studies coupled with GIS-maps (reviewed by McLoughlin et al 2010, Cagnacci et al 2010, Frair et al 2010, it is often easy to lose track of what resource potential a habitat have to the animals. Several studies provide strong evidence of the importance of forage quality and quantity in patch and habitat selection (Langvatn and Hanley 1993, Hanley 1997, Coulombe et al 2011. Many studies of broader scale habitat selection rely on habitat maps constructed for other purposes (Godvik et al 2009, Loe et al 2011; as a result, resource levels are often not measured or are averaged at the level of habitat or patch type.…”
Section: Small-scale Spatial Variation In Habitat Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%