1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf00611905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of food on the absorption of acetylsalicylic acid from enteric-coated dosage forms

Abstract: The absorption of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) from two different enteric-coated dosage forms, tablets (Premaspin) and granules (Reumyl), was studied in healthy volunteers under fasting and non-fasting conditions by following the plasma concentration and urine recovery of salicylates after single doses of ASA 1 g. Conventional tablets (Aspirin) were used as the reference. Under fasting conditions the absorption of ASA from the two different enteric-coated preparations was complete. Taken with food the enteric-co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique has been employed to compare the absorption of acetylsalicylic acid from enteric-coated tablets and granules in both fasting and non-fasting individuals (Bogentoft et al, 1978). When taken with food, the tablets remained in the stomach for around 4 h, probably because of the screening effect of the pylorus (see above, under Gastric emptying); under fasting conditions they were emptied in less than 1 h. In contrast, granules did not exhibit this difference.…”
Section: Indirect Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has been employed to compare the absorption of acetylsalicylic acid from enteric-coated tablets and granules in both fasting and non-fasting individuals (Bogentoft et al, 1978). When taken with food, the tablets remained in the stomach for around 4 h, probably because of the screening effect of the pylorus (see above, under Gastric emptying); under fasting conditions they were emptied in less than 1 h. In contrast, granules did not exhibit this difference.…”
Section: Indirect Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in concentration for SA and ASA were observed in this study, which might be influenced by the intake of food. Bogentoft et al (1978) repoterd that the absorption of ASA from an enteric-coated preparation under nonfasting conditions was later than that in fasting conditions. They determined plasma levels of SA after administration of enteric-coated tablets under fasting and non-fasting conditions.…”
Section: Quantification Of Asa and Sa In Patients' Serum Samplesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An enteric-coated tablet is designed to resist disintegration in an acidic environment such as the stomach and pass it without dissolution. However, enteric-coated preparations have variable actions and incomplete absorption (Ross-Lee et al, 1982;Roberts et al, 1984;Bogentoft et al, 1978), and therefore the pharmacokinetics of enteric-coated low-dose ASA has not yet been clarified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Evaluation of urinary excre tion data from standard bioavailability stud ies has shown the enteric granules and plain aspirin to be equally bioavailable [18]. The small size of these granules allows them to be readily emptied from the stomach and they are protected by the enteric coat from disso lution during residence in the stomach [19]. This study shows that for acute usage, the stomach safety advantage provided by en teric coating is maintained when the delivery system is reduced from the enteric tablet to the enteric-coated granule formulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%