2012
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of flow rate and scaffold pore size on cell behavior during mechanical stimulation in a flow perfusion bioreactor

Abstract: FJ. Influence of flow rate and scaffold pore size on cell behavior during mechanical stimulation in a flow perfusion bioreactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2012;109(6):1583-1594.-Use LicenceAttribution-Non-Commercial-ShareAlike 1.0 You are free:• to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work.• to make derivative works. Under the following conditions:• Attribution -You must give the original author credit.• Non-Commercial -You may not use this work for commercial purposes.• AbstractMechanically sti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
93
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
5
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…p=90%). For example, a dynamic cell culture study, in which bone cells seeded in a collagen-GAG scaffold were exposed to fluid perfusion (1mL/min), suggested that larger pore sizes (d=325µm) were preferable for mechanical stimulation for a better cell attachment, and an average WSS of 17.6mPa resulted in the scaffold (McCoy et al 2012). If the scaffolds were fabricated by rapid prototyping with spherical or cubical pores of 325µm, an average WSS of 12.7mPa and 8.2mPa would result for spherical and cubical architectures (p=90%) under a similar flow rate (1mL/min).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…p=90%). For example, a dynamic cell culture study, in which bone cells seeded in a collagen-GAG scaffold were exposed to fluid perfusion (1mL/min), suggested that larger pore sizes (d=325µm) were preferable for mechanical stimulation for a better cell attachment, and an average WSS of 17.6mPa resulted in the scaffold (McCoy et al 2012). If the scaffolds were fabricated by rapid prototyping with spherical or cubical pores of 325µm, an average WSS of 12.7mPa and 8.2mPa would result for spherical and cubical architectures (p=90%) under a similar flow rate (1mL/min).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…architecture, pore size and porosity) and the precise contribution of each toward resulting mechanical stimulation within a scaffold is difficult to characterise due to the range of interacting parameters. While previous studies have characterised WSS as a function of architecture, pore-size or porosity, the range of parameters considered in many of these studies is limited, with studies perhaps only considering a single pore-size (McCoy et al 2012) or porosity (Melchels et al 2011), for example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the knowledge gathered in mechanotransduction studies has mainly been translated in the development of bioreactor to produce in vitro artificial tissues, e.g. (Sikavitsas et al 2003;McCoy et al 2012). Indeed for clinical applications, bone scaffolds are often facing load-bearing situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%