Influence of fish swimming on the flow pattern of circular tanks

Abstract

The effect of swimming fish on the average velocity and velocity profile of a circular tank was studied. Working with different inlet diameters and flow rates, nine different impulse forces (configurations) were evaluated. Each configuration was tested with and without fish, and the effects of two different fish sizes were compared.\ud \ud The velocity profiles in experiments with fish presented a considerable reduction in velocity in the centre of the tank near the outlet, which was a consequence of the increase in the kinematic eddy viscosity due to the turbulence introduced by fish swimming. A flattening of the angular velocity profile was observed in the central area of the tank, which had a radius of about 0.3 m (18% of the total volume of the tank).\ud \ud A previous model proposed by Oca and Masaló (2013) was modified in order to better describe the distribution of velocities in the central volume of a tank with swimming fish. The proposed modification was based on Burgers¿ proposal for a bathtub vortex, which implies the determination of the parameter (1¿e¿ar2)(1¿e¿ar2), where r is the radius and the a values were experimentally obtained for each tank configuration, in which they increased with the impulse force.\ud \ud The average velocities in the tank were proportional to the square root of the impulse force in experiments with and without fish. Experiments with fish presented lower average velocities, which imply higher tank resistance coefficients. At similar stocking densities (14.6 kg/m3), the increase in the tank resistance coefficients obtained with small fish sizes (154 g) were slightly higher than those obtained with bigger fish sizes (330 g).Postprint (updated version

Effect of tank shape on survival and growth of Pacific bluefin tuna Thunnus orientalis larvae

“…Flow field structures in tanks differ by tank size and shape (Sakakura et al, 2019;Moore and Prange, 1994). CTs have an axisymmetrical flow field pattern (Sumida et al, 2013), and the flow field provides a uniform current environment and facilitates the elimination of biosolids from the tank bottom (Masalό and Oca, 2016;Oca and Masalό, 2013;Timmons et al, 1998). In the case of RTs, 3-D complicated flow fields and lowflow areas were observed in this study, confirming the findings of a previous study 13 (Takakuwa et al, 2018).…”

Investigation of the inlet layout effect on the solid waste removal in an octagonal aquaculture tank

“…A review of the literature indicates that different optimal velocities have been proposed to maximize the health and growth of fish in the aquaculture industry (Oca et al, 2007;Masalóet al, 2016;Wang, 2019). Generally, fish incline to swim in water with high dissolved oxygen.…”

Hydrodynamics of an in-pond raceway system with an aeration plug-flow device for application in aquaculture: an experimental study

“…The conditions in turn affect the physiological function and behaviour of the fish. Their movements increase turbulence, which affects the hydrodynamic conditions such as the drag coefficient, the average velocity distribution and the mixing time of the water body [38,39]. The residual bait and metabolic wastes produced by fish farming may also affect water quality.…”