1996
DOI: 10.1109/20.497534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of finite ground planes on the transmission line current distribution

Abstract: The knowledge of the current distribution on the ground plane of a Printed Circuit Board (PCB) is important to overcome many electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) problems. In this paper a Method of Moments (MOM) algorithm is used to evaluate the surface current distribution on the ground (GND) plane. In order to consider the effects of GNDplanes to the signal behaviour on transmission lines, infinite planes are often assumed to reduce the calculation time. The comparison of the currents using finite and infinit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 that front to back ratio, defined as the ratio of gain in front direction to the gain in the back direction, along with gain increases from model 1 to model 3. The substantial increase in the density of surface currents on the outer boundary of truncated ground plane in model 1 is responsible for low gain and rather poor front to back ratio as was previously proven in experimental [18] and numerical studies [19], [20]. Whereas, in model 2 and model 3, the substrate extended beyond the ground plane attenuates the undesired surface currents to a higher degree, resulting in higher gain and improved front to back ratio.…”
Section: ) Mode 2 (Directional Pattern)mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…3 that front to back ratio, defined as the ratio of gain in front direction to the gain in the back direction, along with gain increases from model 1 to model 3. The substantial increase in the density of surface currents on the outer boundary of truncated ground plane in model 1 is responsible for low gain and rather poor front to back ratio as was previously proven in experimental [18] and numerical studies [19], [20]. Whereas, in model 2 and model 3, the substrate extended beyond the ground plane attenuates the undesired surface currents to a higher degree, resulting in higher gain and improved front to back ratio.…”
Section: ) Mode 2 (Directional Pattern)mentioning
confidence: 59%