1995
DOI: 10.1016/0377-8401(95)00767-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of fibrous feed ingredients on voluntary intake of dry sows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
1
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
23
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…V). This result did not confirm the data obtained in grouphoused growing pigs [27] or in adult sows [3], which indicate that animals are quieter with increased DF level. However, in agreement with the results of the present study, Ramonet et al [13,25] and Le Goff and Noblet (unpublished data) found no effect of DF content on HP act in adult sows housed individually in respiration chambers.…”
Section: Influence Of Dietary Fibre On Metabolic Utilisation Of Energcontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…V). This result did not confirm the data obtained in grouphoused growing pigs [27] or in adult sows [3], which indicate that animals are quieter with increased DF level. However, in agreement with the results of the present study, Ramonet et al [13,25] and Le Goff and Noblet (unpublished data) found no effect of DF content on HP act in adult sows housed individually in respiration chambers.…”
Section: Influence Of Dietary Fibre On Metabolic Utilisation Of Energcontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…2 Mean body weight in the middle of the period in the respiration chamber. 3 The additional peak of heat production (i.e. "ghost" phenomenon) was included in the short-term TEF (see text).…”
Section: Calculations and Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We were not so much interested in the sows' motivation to feed, but rather in how lameness status affects the likelihood that a sow will fulfil this motivation. To achieve this goal, we used a reward that had great incentive value because it was highly palatable and because our sows were fed at commercial feed levels, which satisfy only about 40% to 60% of their ad libitum feed intake (Brouns et al, 1995;Meunier-Salaün et al, 2001). Such commercial feeding levels are known to leave sows hungry (Lawrence et al, 1988;Lawrence and Terlouw, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group pens (3.34 m 2 /sow) had a partly slatted concrete floor and solid concrete laying areas. The sows were fed a restricted diet as commonly used in practice, with 2.6 kg of a commercial gestation diet fed from an electronic sow feeder, which satisfies only about 40% to 60% of their ad libitum feed intake (Brouns et al, 1995;Meunier-Salaün et al, 2001). Water was available ad libitum.…”
Section: Test Arenamentioning
confidence: 99%