Influence of femoral morphology and canal fill ratio on early radiological and clinical outcomes of uncemented total hip arthroplasty using a fully coated stem
Abstract:Aims The diversity of femoral morphology renders femoral component sizing in total hip arthroplasty (THA) challenging. We aimed to determine whether femoral morphology and femoral component filling influence early clinical and radiological outcomes following THA using fully hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated femoral components. Methods We retrospectively reviewed records of 183 primary uncemented THAs. Femoral morphology, including Dorr classification, canal bone ratio (CBR), canal flare index (CFI), and canal-calcar … Show more
“…This study found that at a 5-year follow-up, patients with Dorr type A femurs had a 7.8% incidence of radiolucent lines compared with 2.5% (p < 0.001). Other studies of fully HA-coated stems of a comparable design ( 10 ) as well as proximally coated stems ( 11 , 12 ) reveal similar findings. Additionally, Magill et al ( 13 ) and Karayiannis et al ( 14 ) both report a statistical relationship between under-sizing the Corail stem and the development of radiolucent lines in zone 7.…”
“…This study found that at a 5-year follow-up, patients with Dorr type A femurs had a 7.8% incidence of radiolucent lines compared with 2.5% (p < 0.001). Other studies of fully HA-coated stems of a comparable design ( 10 ) as well as proximally coated stems ( 11 , 12 ) reveal similar findings. Additionally, Magill et al ( 13 ) and Karayiannis et al ( 14 ) both report a statistical relationship between under-sizing the Corail stem and the development of radiolucent lines in zone 7.…”
“…Ishi et al [ 18 ] showed that poor radiographic outcomes of uncemented stems were associated with a high canal flare index (CFI) and insufficient proximal filling, especially in Japanese women with narrow femoral canals. Similarly, D’Ambrosio et al [ 19 ] evaluated the influence of femoral morphology or femoral component filling on radiological outcomes following THA using a fully HA-coated femoral stem. In a series of 183 THAs, they found that femurs with either proximally flared or distally narrowed canals, or insufficient proximal filling, tend to have less favourable radiological outcomes.…”
Purpose
Short stems use has increased substantially despite variable results reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to report the rate of complications using a short stem implanted through the direct anterior approach (DAA), and to evaluate mid-term clinical and radiological results focusing on femoral stem fixation.
Methods
Between April 2009 and November 2014, 698 elective total hip arthroplasties (THAs) were performed using a fully hydroxyapatite-coated short stem (AMIStem-H®). The mean age was 65.7 years (SD 12.6). Patients were invited for clinical and radiological evaluation, and to complete patient-reported outcomes questionnaires at two and five years after surgery. The mean follow-up was 6.2 years (range 2–9.73 years).
Results
During the study period, 59 (8.5%) patients died and 24 (3.4%) were lost to follow-up. There were six (0.9%) dislocations and 12 (1.7%) fractures, seven occurred intra-operatively. Twenty-nine (4.2%) THAs required revision surgery. Eleven THAs were revised for aseptic loosening of the stem at a mean 4.9 years (1.2–7.3 years). Five years after surgery, radiographs of 324 THAs (324/425 eligible = 76.2%) were available. Stem subsidence ≥ 2 mm was present in 42 cases (12.9%), proximal radiolucencies in 101 hips (31.5%), cortical thickening in 52 (16.0%), and a pedestal in 219 (67.6%). An Engh score between − 10 and 0 was associated with lower HHS pain subscore (p = 0.005), a higher risk of stem revision for aseptic loosening (18.8% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.008), and was more frequent in younger patients with ASA score 1.
Conclusion
Patients presenting radiological alterations at five years had an increased risk of revision for aseptic stem loosening and also inferior clinical results. Our study warrants further continued scrutiny of mid- and long-term survivorship of the AMIStem-H®, with radiological results at five years indicating suboptimal fixation of the stem in younger and active patients.
“…The dimension of the implant was evaluated by radiographic measurement of the CFR [ 15 ] at 4 different levels on the postoperative radiograph: at the level of the lesser trochanter, 2 cm above and below the lesser trochanter and 7 cm below the lesser trochanter ( Fig. 1 ).…”
Background
Choosing the right size of the stem is crucial for uncemented hip arthroplasty. Undersizing can lead to early loosening, peri-prosthetic fracture due to femoral implant insertion, and/or osteointegration failure. The main objective of this study was to find a correlation between the surgical approach and the intramedullary prosthetic canal fill ratio (CFR) of the uncemented femoral implant. The hypothesis of this work was that the surgical approach does not influence the stem sizing during hip arthroplasty.
Methods
In this consecutive series, we analyzed the radiological images of 183 patients who underwent primary hip arthroplasty with 4 different surgical approaches. Dimensions of the implant were evaluated by radiographic measurement of the CFR. In order to assess the shape of the femur, we measured the canal flare index on the preoperative radiographs, and the canal calcar ratio was also measured to establish the shape of the femur according to Dorr's classification.
Results
No significant difference was found between the surgical approach and the CFR measured at 4 different levels (CFR 1, 2, 3, and 4) on the postoperative radiograph. When the shape of the femur was assessed by canal flare index, there was no significant difference in implant, whether the femur had a stovepipe canal shape or a champagne-fluted canal shape.
Conclusion
This study showed that the surgical approach in hip arthroplasty does not influence the canal fill. Therefore, the surgical approach does not factor in undersizing the femoral implant. Despite some difficulties in the exposure of the medullary shaft described by some authors, the anterior approach is not a risk factor for undersizing an anatomical femoral stem.
Level of evidence
4
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.