Influence of feedback characteristics on perceived learning value of feedback in clerkships: does culture matter?

Abstract

BackgroundVarious feedback characteristics have been suggested to positively influence student learning. It is not clear how these feedback characteristics contribute to students’ perceived learning value of feedback in cultures classified low on the cultural dimension of individualism and high on power distance. This study was conducted to validate the influence of five feedback characteristics on students’ perceived learning value of feedback in an Indonesian clerkship context.MethodsWe asked clerks in Neurology (n = 169) and Internal Medicine (n = 132) to assess on a 5-point Likert scale the learning value of the feedback they received. We asked them to record whether the feedback provider (1) informed the student what went well, (2) mentioned which aspects of performance needed improvement, (3) compared the student’s performance to a standard, (4) further explained or demonstrated the correct performance, and (5) prepared an action plan with the student to improve performance. Data were analyzed using multilevel regression.ResultsA total of 250 students participated in this study, 131 from Internal Medicine (response rate 99%) and 119 from Neurology (response rate 70%). Of these participants, 225 respondents (44% males, 56% females) completed the form and reported 889 feedback moments. Students perceived feedback as more valuable when the feedback provider mentioned their weaknesses (β = 0.153, p < 0.01), compared their performance to a standard (β = 0.159, p < 0.01), explained or demonstrated the correct performance (β = 0.324, p < 0.001) and prepared an action plan with the student (β =0.496, p < 0.001). Appraisal of good performance did not influence the perceived learning value of feedback. No gender differences were found for perceived learning value.ConclusionsIn Indonesia, we could validate four out of the five characteristics for effective feedback. We argue that our findings relate to culture, in particular to the levels of individualism and power distance. The recognized characteristics of what constitutes effective feedback should be validated across cultures.

Chinese doctors’ views on workplace-based assessment: trainee and supervisor perspectives of the mini-CEX

“…This could reflect cultural norms regarding roles in learning, in which teachers are leaders, guides and masters [27]. This finding also resonates with recent research in East Asian countries that support the educational value of the mini-CEX [15,16]. Traditional teacher-centred Chinese and medical cultures highlight a power differential [15,27,29,46].…”

“…Furthermore, the acceptability of educational innovation may determine the utility of the mini-CEX in new cultural contexts [14,15]. Studies in southeast Asia have indicated variability in shared understanding and acceptance of the mini-CEX [16,17].…”

The relationship between empathy and stress: a cross-sectional study among undergraduate medical students

“…In this regards, positive role-modeling process in showing empathy from the superior level can become a strength point for medical students’ empathy development. Studies on the influence of hierarchical culture on feedback [34] and clinical reasoning teaching and learning [35] show that acknowledgement of culture in a certain setting is critical to facilitate development process of medical students’ competencies.…”

Parent feedback: perception of parents and pediatric residents in Asian culture

“…Moreover, cultural differences also in uence the perceived learning value of feedback. Indonesian medical students recognized characteristics of four valuable feedback consisting of weaknesses mentioned by provider, comparing performance to a standard, explaining or demonstrating the correct performance, and preparing an action plan with the student [14]. Appraisal of good performance, another valuable characteristic of feedback, was not valued from Indonesian students.…”