1996
DOI: 10.1029/96jb00326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of F(OH)−1 substitution on the relative mechanical strength of rock‐forming micas

Abstract: Microtextural and experimental studies have yielded conflicting data on the relative mechanical strengths of muscovite and biotite [Wilson and Bell, 1979; Kronenberg et al., 1990; Mares and Kronenberg, 1993]. We propose a crystal‐chemical resolution to this conflict, namely, that (001) dislocation glide in biotite is rate‐limited by its fluorine content. Significant F(OH)−1 substitution, and concomitant removal of hydroxyl H+ directed into the interlayer cavity, potentially increases mechanical strength of bio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation between F content and 3'•, -3'a in these experiments is based upon a limited number of data points and may not be a real property of micas. It is noted here primarily because of the work of Dahl and Dorais [1996], which related mechanical strength to F content. If later experiments confirm this effect, it may be related to changes in hardness or differences in cell constants (that effect dislocation energetics) produced by F(OH)_• substitution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The correlation between F content and 3'•, -3'a in these experiments is based upon a limited number of data points and may not be a real property of micas. It is noted here primarily because of the work of Dahl and Dorais [1996], which related mechanical strength to F content. If later experiments confirm this effect, it may be related to changes in hardness or differences in cell constants (that effect dislocation energetics) produced by F(OH)_• substitution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dislocation movement and dissociation were observed in biotite and muscovite samples and related to the underlying crystal structures. There is a large volume of literature concerning the slip systems, deformation structures, and hardness of micas [Christoffersen and Kronenberg, 1993 Dahl and Dorais [1996] attributed conflicting data on the mechanical strengths of muscovite and biotite to differences in F content. Substitution of F for OH in phlogopite has been found to decrease the c axial length, and this has been attributed to a decrease in coulombic repulsion between interlayer cations and OH protons [Papin et al, 1997;Robert et al, 1993, Noda andUshio, 1956].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bell and Wilson (1977, 1981), Wilson and Bell (1979), and Noe and Veblen (1999) The biotite studied by Bell and Wilson (1977, 1981) and Wilson and Bell (1979) was more susceptible to deformation than coexisting muscovite, but contained a low concentration of E In contrast, the biotite investigated by Kronenberg et al (1990) and Mares and Kronenberg (1993) was stronger than muscovite, but was F-rich. Dahl and Dorais (1996) have interpreted this apparent contradiction on the basis of the different content of fluorine. In trioctahedral micas, the OH dipole is perpendicular to the (001) plane, directed towards the interlayer cation (Bassett, 1960).…”
Section: Polytype Formation and Mechanical Strength: Crystallographicmentioning
confidence: 99%