2008
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2008.990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of extrinsic contribution on the macroscopic properties of hard and soft lead zirconate titanate ceramics

Abstract: Abstract-In this work, the contribution of the extrinsic effect to the macroscopic properties in soft and hard lead zirconate titanate ceramics is directly evaluated. Close to the room temperature, poled hard ceramics show an anomalous behavior, which is notably different from that of soft ceramics, not only in dielectric but also in piezoelectric and elastic responses. Hence, at room temperature their properties are thermally stable and the losses are unusually low. It is suggested that two mechanisms are pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,19,20 The qualitative difference between hard and undoped on one and soft samples on the other side has been linked to the higher concentration of oxygen vacancies in the former samples; oxygen vacancies are associated with acceptor dopants and are known to control the mobility of domain walls. 21,22 Our measurements reveal much smaller variation between the hard, soft and undoped samples and weaker temperature dependence at 13.4 GHz than at 100 kHz. This gives further supports to the idea that the low frequency anomalies are indeed related to domain wall motion that becomes suppressed at higher frequencies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…10,19,20 The qualitative difference between hard and undoped on one and soft samples on the other side has been linked to the higher concentration of oxygen vacancies in the former samples; oxygen vacancies are associated with acceptor dopants and are known to control the mobility of domain walls. 21,22 Our measurements reveal much smaller variation between the hard, soft and undoped samples and weaker temperature dependence at 13.4 GHz than at 100 kHz. This gives further supports to the idea that the low frequency anomalies are indeed related to domain wall motion that becomes suppressed at higher frequencies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…For the un-poled specimens, the real and imaginary dielectric constants increase with increasing ZnO content, achieving the maximum value at x = 1, and then decreasing for x > 1. These increases attribute to the increase of grain size with increasing amounts of ZnO additive, which lead to the increased polarizability (intrinsic contribution) and easily shifting domain wall motion (extrinsic contribution) resulting in both dielectric constant and dielectric loss increase [31][32][33][34][35][36]. For 1 < x < 1.5, the amount of ZnO, exceeding the solid solubility, gradually segregates at the grain boundary to inhibit the grain growth resulting in the decrease of grain size leading to decreasing the dielectric constant and dielectric loss.…”
Section: Dielectric Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 The extrinsic response is mainly due to domain wall motion in piezoceramics, as has been extensively reported. [8][9][10] It is therefore expected that different domain wall dynamics will lead to significant differences in both nonlinear dielectric response (i.e., permittivity as a function of applied electric field amplitude) and ferroelectric response (i.e., P-E hysteresis loop characteristics).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%