1977
DOI: 10.1016/0376-6357(77)90039-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of environmental disturbances on uterine motility during pregnancy and parturition in rabbit and sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transient inhibition clearly observed in one ewe at the time of mating was compatible with the reported effects of stress (Bontekoë, Blacquière, Naaktgeboren, Dieleman & Willems, 1977). Conversely, the absence of significant motility changes in 5 out of the 6 ewes disagrees with the findings of Lehrer, Schindler, Brown & Fischler (1978/79) who noted a significant increase, after mating, in both amplitude and frequency of pressure cycles, as recorded by means of intraluminal pressure-sensitive telemetrie transducers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 41%
“…The transient inhibition clearly observed in one ewe at the time of mating was compatible with the reported effects of stress (Bontekoë, Blacquière, Naaktgeboren, Dieleman & Willems, 1977). Conversely, the absence of significant motility changes in 5 out of the 6 ewes disagrees with the findings of Lehrer, Schindler, Brown & Fischler (1978/79) who noted a significant increase, after mating, in both amplitude and frequency of pressure cycles, as recorded by means of intraluminal pressure-sensitive telemetrie transducers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 41%
“…The present study shows the nearly synchronous appearance of regular activity in the cervix and the uterus. Such a pattern of periodic activity has been described for the uterus of the pregnant ewe by many authors using different terminology such as "train of action potentials" (Krishnarmurti, Kitts & Tompkins, 1979); "bursts" (Harding et ai, 1982); and "periods or bursts of activity" (Bontekoë, Blacquiere, Naakteboren, Dieleman & Willems, 1977). No preferential spread of activation between the uterus and cervix has been demonstrated, in agreement with Harding et al (1982) who have shown that activity appears synchronously at several sites in the uterus, suggesting humoral control or diffuse stimulation by a nerve network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Given that does could produce sufficient OT for postpartum nursing, it seems that stimuli signaling parturition and stimulating the necessary peripheral release of OT were either lacking or blocked rather than that the hypothalamus was not able to produce OT. Mechanisms enabling the inhibition of birth signals certainly exist as demonstrated by the well-known ability of mammals to temporarily delay parturition if environmental conditions are unfavorable [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%