1967
DOI: 10.1088/0370-1328/92/1/313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of electron distribution on atomic interaction potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) V, , and VDD (the anion-anion short-range interactions) are obtained by using the theoretical models developed by Wedepohl (1967) and Gordon and Kim (1972). These models are based on the density functional treatment of the uniform electron gas.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) V, , and VDD (the anion-anion short-range interactions) are obtained by using the theoretical models developed by Wedepohl (1967) and Gordon and Kim (1972). These models are based on the density functional treatment of the uniform electron gas.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A so far and the majority of calculations performed [6][7][8][9][10] were based on empirical pair potentials for He in metals, particularly in Fe, as constructed by Wilson [11] in the late 1960s. The Fe potential was calculated using the modified Wedepohl [12] method based on the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac formalism. The exchange energy of the electrons was treated within the homogeneous gas approximation, ignoring correlation effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were many prior examples in the literature of models similar to that of Gordon and Kim. Many of the detailed approximations had been foreshadowed by earlier treatments, particularly those of Sida [40], Wedepohl [41], Abrahamson [42] and Gaydaenko and Nikulin [43]. These approaches all stem from the Thomas-Fermi (TF) and Thomas-Fermi-Dirac (TFD) theories.…”
Section: § 1 Introduction and Historical Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant difference between GK theory and TFD theory is that in the former the density is input from more accurate calculations while in the latter it is obtained variationally (see § 2). This approach had already been investigated by Wedepohl [41] for example. What made the Gordon-Kim paper a turningpoint was that until their paper the realm of applicability of these theories had been restricted to the repulsive region.…”
Section: § 1 Introduction and Historical Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%