2014
DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2014.338.352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Electron Beam Treatment on the Crystallization and Thermal Stability of Ldpe/Epdm Blends

Abstract: The effect of blend composition and Electron Beam (EB) irradiation on the crystallization and thermal behavior of Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE)/Ethylene-Propylene-Diene elastomer (EPDM) blends had been studied. Melting temperatures were found to remain unchanged upon variation of blend composition as well as irradiation dose. But the degree of crystallinity and T c (crystallization temperature) were decreased with increase in EPDM content and EB dose. On the other hand, thermal stability (in terms of onset t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have reported in our recent publication that with an increase in radiation dose in the presence and absence of TMPTA and TAC, crystallinity of blends keeps on decreasing for a whole range of composition of LDPE-EPDM blends. 26 Thus evidently we can claim that the modus increase was mainly due to crosslinking of both the polymer phases.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Tensile Properties Measurementmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We have reported in our recent publication that with an increase in radiation dose in the presence and absence of TMPTA and TAC, crystallinity of blends keeps on decreasing for a whole range of composition of LDPE-EPDM blends. 26 Thus evidently we can claim that the modus increase was mainly due to crosslinking of both the polymer phases.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Tensile Properties Measurementmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Gel mass fraction was determined by calculating the ratio between mass of the sample after processing and mass of the sample before processing [ 33 , 34 ], according to …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%