1994
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1994.9712709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Elaboration on the Framing of Decision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
77
2
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
77
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…By including a no-framing condition, we were able to examine the magnitude of framing effects and found that participants receiving positive framing were more affected by attribute framing than those receiving negative framing. Also this finding is consistent with asymmetrical information processing effects of negative versus positive framing and the position that more effortful and less heuristic processing may reduce susceptibility to cognitive biases (e.g., Sieck & Yates, 1997;Takemura, 1994;Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). This is not to say, however, that effortful processing should always reduce framing effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By including a no-framing condition, we were able to examine the magnitude of framing effects and found that participants receiving positive framing were more affected by attribute framing than those receiving negative framing. Also this finding is consistent with asymmetrical information processing effects of negative versus positive framing and the position that more effortful and less heuristic processing may reduce susceptibility to cognitive biases (e.g., Sieck & Yates, 1997;Takemura, 1994;Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). This is not to say, however, that effortful processing should always reduce framing effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Accordingly, if negative framing decision makers engage in more systematic and relatively less heuristic processing than positive framing decision makers, they should also deviate less from rational norms of decision making and be less susceptible to attribute framing effects. Indirect support for this prediction is provided by research evidence showing that induced elaborated thinking eliminates or reduces risky choice framing effects, such as when decision makers are asked to provide justification for their choice or spend more time on a decision making task (e.g., Sieck & Yates, 1997;Takemura, 1982Takemura, , 1994. Another piece of indirect evidence stems from studies revealing that subjects with higher need-for-cognition scores 1 are less susceptible to risky choice framing effects (Chatterjee et al, 2000;Smith & Levin, 1996).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 This experiment was first conducted using a student sample but has been replicated in many other settings (e.g., Takemura 1994;Kuhberger 1995;Jou, Shanteau, and Harris 1996;Bless, Betsch, and Franzen 1998;Druckman 2001). All respondents were initially given the following scenario:…”
Section: Experiments 2: Asian Disease Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first stream of research focuses on various techniques of increasing the amount of thought -by making the participants accountable for the results of the decision, typically by either informing them that they would be asked to write a justification or actually writing it (Takemura, 1994). Takemura's study supported this method, however the results obtained by Sieck and Yates (1997) show that only getting the subjects to write the account removes the effect, which may mean that it is not only the motivation but also a 're-framing' of the scenario that reduces the effect.…”
Section: Asian Disease As a Classical Scenario For Framing Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%