“…9,24,25 Nevertheless, the authors are aware of recent reports that state that acceptable maxillary antero-posterior growth is accomplished in both single and two stage palate repair. 28,29 A factor of major influence seems to be the involvement of the hard palate, since the frequency of PFS is 38.5% in CCP (10 of 26) against 29.2% in ICP (7 of 24) patients, this result is in accordance with the reports of De Buys Roessingh and Vedung. 23,26 A possible explanation could be the attachment of the vomer, since a report by Bicknell et al revealed that clefts with an unattached vomer are far more likely to require a PFS.…”