1983
DOI: 10.1080/02619180.1983.11753197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of dynamic restoration mechanisms on the hot workability of Waspaloy and concentrated FCC alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2] and [3]. The determined value of Q is consistent with the value of 410 kJ/mol reported by McQueen et al [10] for hot deformation of Waspaloy in the temperature range of 1173 K to 1473 K (900°C to 1200°C). Figure 3 shows the microstructure of the as-received material.…”
Section: A the Activation Energy For Hot Deformationsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[2] and [3]. The determined value of Q is consistent with the value of 410 kJ/mol reported by McQueen et al [10] for hot deformation of Waspaloy in the temperature range of 1173 K to 1473 K (900°C to 1200°C). Figure 3 shows the microstructure of the as-received material.…”
Section: A the Activation Energy For Hot Deformationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…[9][10][11] The only equation for grain size evolution in Waspaloy during hot deformation is the one proposed by Shen et al [12] obtained from Gleeble compression testing. At the beginning of the current study, attempt was made to compare the measured grain size of isothermally hot compressed Waspaloy with the calculated one using the equation proposed in Reference 12.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chamanfar et al [32] calculated the values of Q for subsolvus (950-1020 • C) and supersolvus (1060-1140 • C) deformation for Waspaloy at strain rates ranging from 0.001 s −1 to 1 s −1 as 1400 ± 372 kJ/mol and 462 ± 95 kJ/mol, respectively. The calculated value of Q for Waspaloy (630.17 kJ/mol) is much larger than the values presented by the authors of works [31,33,39] but fits perfectly in the range indicated by the author of [32]. It should be noted, that this value depends on the investigated deformation conditions ranges such as temperature and strain rate.…”
Section: Constitutive Equation and Activation Energy Mapsupporting
confidence: 41%
“…For Waspaloy there is also a discrepancy of this value. Shen et al [31], McQueen et al [33], and Matsui [39] calculated the activation energy for the hot working of Waspaloy as equal to 468 kJ/mol, 410 kJ/mol and 384 kJ/mol respectively. Chamanfar et al [32] calculated the values of Q for subsolvus (950-1020 • C) and supersolvus (1060-1140 • C) deformation for Waspaloy at strain rates ranging from 0.001 s −1 to 1 s −1 as 1400 ± 372 kJ/mol and 462 ± 95 kJ/mol, respectively.…”
Section: Constitutive Equation and Activation Energy Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation