Influence of drying and HEMA treatment on dentin wettability

Hitmi, Laïla; Bouter, Denis; Degrange, Michel

doi:10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00075-6

Cited by 45 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The higher SBS value of TheraCal LC compared with MTA and Fuji IX may be due in part to the resin content in TheraCal LC; which provides a chemical bond with the composite. Moreover, TheraCal LC contains a hydrophilic resin monomer that makes it an excellent adhesion promoter enhancing bond strength 26,29,30) . On the other hand, the lack of resin content in MTA and conventional GIC indicates that their bond to resin composite is purely micromechanical 31) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems

Alzraikat

Taha

Qasrawi

et al. 2016

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The shear bond strength (SBS) of TheraCal LC to resin composite was evaluated in comparison to Mineral trioxide aggregate (ProRoot MTA) and conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) using two adhesive systems. A hole was prepared in 90 acrylic blocks (6 mm diameter, 2 mm deep) then filled with TheraCal LC, MTA or Fuji IX (n=30/group). Each group was bonded with either an etch and rinse or 1-step self-etch adhesive. Filtek Z250 composite was bonded to each capping material. Bond strength was tested in a universal testing machine, and data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Duncan's Multiple range test (p<0.05). TheraCal LC displayed the highest SBS (p<0.001). MTA bonded with the 1-step self-etch adhesive showed the lowest SBS (p<0.001), while SBS of TheraCal LC and Fuji IX did not differ between either adhesive (p>0.05). TheraCal LC is the preferred choice in pulp capping procedures when using resin composite restorations.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems

Alzraikat

Taha

Qasrawi

et al. 2016

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hence, the optimal amount of surface wetness varies among the adhesive systems, leading to different concepts from dry to wet bonding depending on the control of moisture. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Therefore the wetting behaviour is influenced by at least two parameters: the physical-chemical characteristics of the adhesive blend -namely the type of solvent and the hydrophilic/hydrophobic ratio of the monomers -and environmental conditions, i.e., the drying procedure, the surrounding hygrometry and temperature.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dentin wetting by three adhesive systems: Influence of etching time, temperature and relative humidity

Farge¹,

Alderete²,

Ramos³

2010

Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) is a small functional monomer 9 which, although it is excellent adhesion-promoting monomer, 21,22 is capable of diffusing rapidly through non-sclerotic dentin at cytotoxic concentrations 23 causing in vivo inflammatory pulp reactions. 24,25 Moreover, in uncured state, HEMA quickly absorbs water from dentin compromising the degree conversion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%