2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of driving patterns on vehicle emissions: A case study for Latin American cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
15
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall, that of these differences, only the VSP values between the EM and EF driver groups were statistically different, suggesting the VSP differences along road segment 2E2 alone cannot account for differences in the observed emissions. It should also be noted here that using VSPbased emission algorithms developed by Rodríguez et al (2016) for similar vehicle types produced emission rates generally within an order of magnitude of the values reported in Tables 1-3. Table 2 shows the VSP values and pollutant emission rates for the higher speed, uphill road segment 4N1.…”
Section: Figure 5 Heresupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recall, that of these differences, only the VSP values between the EM and EF driver groups were statistically different, suggesting the VSP differences along road segment 2E2 alone cannot account for differences in the observed emissions. It should also be noted here that using VSPbased emission algorithms developed by Rodríguez et al (2016) for similar vehicle types produced emission rates generally within an order of magnitude of the values reported in Tables 1-3. Table 2 shows the VSP values and pollutant emission rates for the higher speed, uphill road segment 4N1.…”
Section: Figure 5 Heresupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The VSP approach has subsequently been used to categorize mobile source emissions in numerous studies (e.g. Wang and Fu, 2010;Zhai et al, 2011;Yao et al, 2013;Rodríguez et al, 2016;Zhai et al 2017) and has been incorporated into the most recent USEPA mobile source emissions model, Multi-scale mOtor Vehicle and equipment Emission System or more simply, MOtor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) (Koupal et al, 2003). While many of the studies referenced above have identified driver-to-driver variability as a significant impact on tailpipe pollutant emission, the variability of on-road emissions from segregated, common driver types is not as well researched.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, this accelerates climate change as well as impacts of global warming in the cities [37]. According to Rodriguez et al [38], driving behaviour can limit the annual emission of CO 2 by 12%, CO and HC by 13% each, and NO x emission by 24%. Likewise, the effect of vehicle type and quality of fuel in mitigating climate change was investigated [39].…”
Section: Emissions and Driving Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33] Emission of NOx increases with increase of rapid acceleration [35] Traffic emission was found to increase with over speeding [38] Reducing rapid acceleration was found to decrease annual emission of CO 2 by 12%, CO, and HC by 13% each as well as NOx by 24%.…”
Section: Frequency Aggregation Of Measurement Techniques In Driving Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1999, a great number of studies have applied the conventional VSP equation and coefficients for LDV to estimate the driving power of passenger cars regardless of vehicle model and technology. VSP has been utilized to estimate driving power to construct fuel-consumption and -emission models, and conduct further analysis on the influential factors or contributors to vehicle fuel consumption [1,3,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Nevertheless, before implementing the VSP equation and the LDV coefficients, none of them has performed validation to confirm prediction accuracy of whether the equation and coefficients estimated by the vehicles from the last 20 years can still accurately capture a vehicle or studied vehicle fleet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%