1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1986.tb03270.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Dopaminergic, Adrenergic and Cholinergic Blockade and TRH Administration on Gh Responses to GRF 1–29

Abstract: In order to establish the influence of dopaminergic, alpha-adrenergic and cholinergic pathways on GRF-mediated GH release we have studied the GH responses to GRF 1-29 (100 or 50 micrograms as i.v. bolus) alone and in combination with metoclopramide (MCP, 10 mg, i.v.), thymoxamine (THYM, 210 micrograms/min, 150 min infusion), and atropine (1.2 mg, i.v.). We have also investigated any possible interaction between TRH and GRF in view of the reported inhibitory effects of TRH infusion on stimulated GH release. Dop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In apparent conflict with our findings, Jordan et al [20], using similar doses and mode of drug administration, have re ported that MCP did not change the GH response to GHRH in any way. The wide range of GHRH-induced GH peaks shown in this study [20] indicates a nonuniform distribution of the HSR phases at the time of GHRH testing; and perhaps this is the explanation for the lack of effects of MCP observed by this group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In apparent conflict with our findings, Jordan et al [20], using similar doses and mode of drug administration, have re ported that MCP did not change the GH response to GHRH in any way. The wide range of GHRH-induced GH peaks shown in this study [20] indicates a nonuniform distribution of the HSR phases at the time of GHRH testing; and perhaps this is the explanation for the lack of effects of MCP observed by this group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The wide range of GHRH-induced GH peaks shown in this study [20] indicates a nonuniform distribution of the HSR phases at the time of GHRH testing; and perhaps this is the explanation for the lack of effects of MCP observed by this group. In fact, this also was observed in the present study when the GHRH challenge took place during a spontaneous se cretory phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Pyridostigmine does not cross the blood-brain barrier and thus may be presumed to act either at the median eminence or at the level of the pituitary. An effect of pyri¬ dostigmine to increase endogenous GHRH release is unlikely, as cholinergic antagonists abolish the GH response to GHRH (18,19,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31), and pyri¬ dostigmine enhances the GH response to supramaximal doses of GHRH (21). The effect of cho¬ linergic drugs on pituitary GH release is contro¬ versial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…GH, PRL and insulin were measured by radioimmuno-assay as previously described [8,9]. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels were kindly measured by Prof. M. Preece at the Institute of Child Health, Lon don.…”
Section: Assay Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%