2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2018.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of different thermal cycling treatments on the physical, mechanical and transport properties of granite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e realtime heated sample 2 in this study showed nonmonotonic change in permeability. Permeability of slow-cooling treated granite samples started to drastically increase at approximately 500°C in [26,[30][31][32]. For fast-cooling treated samples, permeability significantly increased at about 400°C seen in [32,33].…”
Section: Comparison and Practical Meaningmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…e realtime heated sample 2 in this study showed nonmonotonic change in permeability. Permeability of slow-cooling treated granite samples started to drastically increase at approximately 500°C in [26,[30][31][32]. For fast-cooling treated samples, permeability significantly increased at about 400°C seen in [32,33].…”
Section: Comparison and Practical Meaningmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Energies 2020, 13,2061 11 of 17 Figure 8. Variations of strain corresponding to upper loads of granite samples with number of temperature and stress cycles at six upper limit cyclic temperatures (a) upper limit of cyclic stress = 70% of UCS, (b) upper limit of cyclic stress = 85% of UCS.…”
Section: Dissipated Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Figure 10, it can be seen that the energy absorbed by the rock samples during the loading process decreases generally with the increase in number of cycles, and then it gradually tends to stabilize. Further, the absorption energy of Energies 2020, 13,2061 12 of 17 the rock samples at 70% loading stress during the loading process reduces successively during the first few cycles and then tends to stabilize, whereas for the samples at 85% loading stress, there is a sharp decrease in the absorption energy during the first two cycles and then changes slightly. Figure 11 shows similar trends for the hysteresis energy when the upper limit of cyclic temperature is 100-500 • C. The hysteresis energy decreases and increases with the number of cycles when the upper limit cyclic temperature is 600 • C and the upper stress limits are 70% and 85% of the UCS.…”
Section: Dissipated Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been shown that cooling rate and maximal temperature are often key parameters in controlling the crack network [Belayachi et al, 2019]. In our study, two cooling protocols were considered: slow cooling [Wang et al, 2013] and thermal shocks [Kim et al, 2014;Mallet et al, 2015;Kumari et al, 2017;Jin et al, 2019], both presenting different maximal temperature [Beck et al, 2016]. Concerning the temperature range, it is common to find in the literature studies investigating the thermally induced cracks from 200 o C to 600 o C [Zhao et al, 2017;Rong et al, 2018;Gautam et al, 2018].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%