Influence of Different Surfactants on Carbon Fiber Dispersion and the Mechanical Performance of Smart Piezoresistive Cementitious Composites

Abstract

This experimental study presents the effect of different surfactants on micro-scale carbon fiber (CFs) distribution into carbon fiber reinforced cement-based composites (CFRC) in terms of flexural and compressive strength, stiffness, flexural toughness, and strain-sensing ability. Conducting a narrative review of the literature focusing on the fibers’ separation, this paper follows a methodology introducing a combination of mechanical and chemical carbon fibers dispersion, as well as the different mixing processes (wet or dry). Three types of surfactants: Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), cellulose nanocrystal (CNC), and superplasticizer (SP), were applied to evaluate the CFs distribution in the cement paste matrix. Compressive and flexural strength, modulus of elasticity, and ductility of the cement-based composites (CFRC) reinforced with 0.5 wt.% CFs were investigated by three-point bending and compressive tests; flexure tests were also conducted on notched 20 × 20 × 80 mm specimens using the Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (L.E.F.M.) theory. Moreover, the electrical conductivity and the piezoresistive response were determined by conducting electrical resistance measurements and applying compressive loading simultaneously. The results clearly reveal that the CFs/SP solution or the CFs’ dry incorporation led to a significant enhancement of flexural strength by 32% and 23.7%, modulus of elasticity by 30% and 20%, and stress-sensing ability by 20.2% and 18.2%, respectively. Although the wet mixing method exhibits improved mechanical and electrical conductivity performance, constituting an adequate strain and crack sensor, the authors propose dry mixing as the most economical method, in addition to the enhanced mechanical and electrical responses. The authors recommend an effective method for structural health monitoring systems combining an economical CFs insertion in cementitious smart sensors with great mechanical and self-sensing responses.

Novel Natural Bee Brick with a Low Energy Footprint for “Green” Masonry Walls: Mechanical Properties

“…The characteristic failure modes of the solid bricks during the compression test are shown in Figure 3. Particularly, in Figure 3a-c the failure modes of the vertical specimen with loading direction parallel to the bed joint are depicted where the brittle diagonal cracks forming a cone-shaped fracture mode are visible [16,17]. Furthermore, the cone-shaped failure mode is more prominent with a load direction perpendicular to the long side of the optical brick in the compression test (Figure 3d-f).…”

Simplified shear equation of deep concrete beam considering orientation effect of opening and mechanical properties of fibre-concrete interface

“…The fibre-reinforced concrete under tension has a promising shear response of concrete structural members which is brought by its tensile response. So, fibres have been proved as a promising non-conventional reinforcement in concrete structural elements under shear stresses due to the beneficial cracking performance of fibre-reinforced concrete that could change the brittle shear failures to more ductile and prolonged failures [ [6] , [7] , [8] ]. In cyclic loads, repeated loading reduces the interlocking of aggregates that weaken the compressive behaviour of structural elements under compression.…”

Mechanical Characterization of Nano-Reinforced Mortar: X-ray Micro-CT for 3D Imaging of Microstructure

“…The mechanical capacities of cementitious composites, such as flexural strength, compressive strength, and toughness, or thermoelectrical properties such as conductivity, are powerfully affected by the additives' dispersion and the pore structure of the material [5,6]. In the pore characterization process, with micro-CT and pore size distribution, the diameter of pores plays a significant role [7] Although conventional volume-based theory considers the perfect spherical morphology according to the maximal ball algorithm, usually characterized by the pore size distribution of the material, these methods provide limitations in relating the anisotropic or heterogeneous pore properties.…”