2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10291-013-0349-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of different GPS receiver antenna calibration models on geodetic positioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A position offset can result when the mean value is applied to the individual antenna, and the magnitude of the offset is station dependent. This was investigated by Baire et al (2014), and they have shown that the offset in the vertical component can be as large as 10 mm, which approximately corresponds to a difference of 0.5 kg m 22 in the IWV. We have carried out a similar investigation using one experimental GPS station located at Onsala Space Observatory (OSO) on the west coast of Sweden, where we processed data twice using two different antenna calibration models (IGS standard and individual calibration).…”
Section: A Changepointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A position offset can result when the mean value is applied to the individual antenna, and the magnitude of the offset is station dependent. This was investigated by Baire et al (2014), and they have shown that the offset in the vertical component can be as large as 10 mm, which approximately corresponds to a difference of 0.5 kg m 22 in the IWV. We have carried out a similar investigation using one experimental GPS station located at Onsala Space Observatory (OSO) on the west coast of Sweden, where we processed data twice using two different antenna calibration models (IGS standard and individual calibration).…”
Section: A Changepointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have shown that differences in PCC for various antennas can reach up to 5 mm at low elevations (from 0°t o 20°) but are usually below 2 mm (above 30°) for both GPS frequencies. Other studies in the field of individual calibrations have been carried out by the GNSS Research Group of the Royal Observatory of Belgium (ROB) (Baire et al 2014) and the Geophysics Laboratory at the University of Luxembourg (LU) (Sidorov and Teferle 2016). In these experiments, the authors used the Precise Point Positioning (PPP) method to estimate the position offset related to different receiver antenna calibration models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PPP technique is widely exploited in GNSS precise positioning and meteorology due to its efficiency and flexibility in analyzing GNSS networks with a large number of stations (Baire et al, 2014; …”
Section: Gps+glonass Ionosphere-free Observation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%