2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.028
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of different conditioning methods on immediate and delayed dentin sealing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
35
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Four studies [ 25 28 ] focused specifically on the presumed benefits of IDS compared to Delayed Dentin Sealing (DDS). In two studies different dentin adhesives acted as an IDS and the authors concluded that they did not alter the retentive strength of adhesively luted ceramic restorations using either of the tested bonding systems [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four studies [ 25 28 ] focused specifically on the presumed benefits of IDS compared to Delayed Dentin Sealing (DDS). In two studies different dentin adhesives acted as an IDS and the authors concluded that they did not alter the retentive strength of adhesively luted ceramic restorations using either of the tested bonding systems [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two studies different dentin adhesives acted as an IDS and the authors concluded that they did not alter the retentive strength of adhesively luted ceramic restorations using either of the tested bonding systems [ 25 , 26 ]. Two other studies concluded that IDS using Clearfil SE Bond resulted in improved shear bond strength compared to DDS [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from this assumption, it can be imagined that dentin surface cleaning may be essential to obtain better bonding between the interfaces [ 7 , 8 ]. Several cleaning methods, both mechanical and chemical, have been proposed [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ozcan et al proposed different cleansing protocols to manage sealed dentin subsequently contaminated by a provisional cement; no significant difference was found in bond values among tested treatments, but none of them was able to reproduce bond strengths similar to a not-contaminated, not-cleaned control group (freshly ground dentin) [19]. Some conditioning treatments (i.e: like a particle abrasion with calcium carbonate, as reported by Falkensammer 2014 et al) might also be contraindicated for the removal of temporary remnants and/or to reactivate the hybridized layer before final cementation [20]. Exploring the current literature, a definitive protocol for cleaning of the immediate sealed dentin layer has not been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%