2016
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/025104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of different binding energies in clusterization approach: fragmentation as an example

Abstract: We study multifragmentation within the framework of a quantum molecular dynamics model using different binding energy formulae in the secondary algorithm; namely, the minimum spanning tree approach. A comparison of theoretical results with experimental data over a wide range of energy, mass and impact parameter is also presented. Our detailed analysis shows an insignificant difference of different binding energies when used at finite temperatures on the fragmentation pattern which, on the other hand, becomes s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the soft equation of state supplemented by the Cugnon parametrization of the nucleon-nucleon (NN) cross-section is used to simulate the above reactions [40]. It is worth mentioning that this choice of the equation of state and NN cross-section has been highly successful in explaining various experimental results [37,38,[41][42][43][44][45][46]. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, the soft equation of state supplemented by the Cugnon parametrization of the nucleon-nucleon (NN) cross-section is used to simulate the above reactions [40]. It is worth mentioning that this choice of the equation of state and NN cross-section has been highly successful in explaining various experimental results [37,38,[41][42][43][44][45][46]. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the nuclear matter incompressibility K = 200 MeV, the values of the parameters , , and are −356 MeV, 303 MeV, and 1.17, respectively. Using this soft equation of state coupled with the energy-dependent nucleon-nucleon cross-section, various experimental observations have been explained in previous studies [37,38,[41][42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: A Quantum Molecular Dynamics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1], it is explained as a temperature dependence of pairing energy with the help of a self-consistent finite-temperature relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov model [6]. In the deexcitation calculation of the statistical abrasion-ablation model [15] and the SACA method [16][17][18][19], or the theoretical parameterizations of T -dependent binding energy using density-functional theory [5], the temperature dependence of pairing energy is still not considered. In fact, the pairing energy of a fragment depends on mass in 1/A 1/2 and the total pairing energy is small for fragments of large A, which suggests that the pairing energy may only have a small influence on the cross section of fragments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature effects in binding energy are usually omitted. Examples can be found in the de-excitation calculation of the statistical abrasion-ablation model [15] and the simulated annealing clusterization algorithm (SACA) method [16][17][18][19]. In a previous analysis of the pairing energies of fragments in projectile fragmentation reactions, it is sug-gested that the pairing-energy coefficients are rather low compared to the standard value [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%