2017
DOI: 10.1299/jamdsm.2017jamdsm0073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of density and nickel content on fatigue strength of powder-forged gears - Comparison with ingot steel and sintered steel -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rolling contact fatigue test with rollers is a test that simulates the tooth surface condition of the gear fatigue test. There have been many reports comparing the results of the rolling contact fatigue test and those of the gear fatigue test done on the same material (Seki and Fujii, 2017).In our previous report (Egashira et al, 2020), subsurface stress analysis was performed during the rolling contact fatigue test inside the 0.0B, the 0.1B, the 0.4B and the SCM415 rollers, whose materials were the same as the 0.0BG, the 0.1BG, the 0.4BG and the SCM415G in this study, respectively. In this chapter, the results of this stress analysis are cited and the difference in gear fatigue strength and mode of tooth surface failure between the 0.0BG and the 0.1BG is discussed.…”
Section: Failure Mode Of the Test Gears (Failure Mode: P→b)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rolling contact fatigue test with rollers is a test that simulates the tooth surface condition of the gear fatigue test. There have been many reports comparing the results of the rolling contact fatigue test and those of the gear fatigue test done on the same material (Seki and Fujii, 2017).In our previous report (Egashira et al, 2020), subsurface stress analysis was performed during the rolling contact fatigue test inside the 0.0B, the 0.1B, the 0.4B and the SCM415 rollers, whose materials were the same as the 0.0BG, the 0.1BG, the 0.4BG and the SCM415G in this study, respectively. In this chapter, the results of this stress analysis are cited and the difference in gear fatigue strength and mode of tooth surface failure between the 0.0BG and the 0.1BG is discussed.…”
Section: Failure Mode Of the Test Gears (Failure Mode: P→b)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many reports on increasing the fatigue strength of sintered gears. For example, fatigue strength was improved by increasing the density by applying the powder-forged method (Seki and Fujii, 2017) and was improved by applying shot peening to the surfaces of sintered rollers and gears (Yoshida et al, 2004). However, if these additional processes were applied in mass production, the advantage in terms of cost-savings in sintered gears would be lost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Densification is effective for improving the fatigue strength of sintered materials. There are many reports that fatigue strength has been improved by densifying the whole material by 2 Press 2 Sinter (Seki and Fujii, 2017;Skoglund et al, 2001) or Hot Isostatic Pressing (Yoshida et al, 1995). Miura et al (2010b) and Takemasu et al (2010) also improved the fatigue strength of sintered gears by densifying only the tooth surface layer by rolling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%