2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4876451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of defect thickness on the angular dependence of coercivity in rare-earth permanent magnets

Abstract: International audienceThe coercive field and angular dependence of the coercive field of single-grain Nd$_{2}$Fe$_{14}$B permanent magnets are computed using finite element micromagnetics. It is shown that the thickness of surface defects plays a critical role in determining the reversal process. For small defect thicknesses reversal is heavily driven by nucleation, whereas with increasing defect thickness domain wall de-pinning becomes more important. This change results in an observable shift between two wel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
36
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…. As it was stated in previous coercivity analysis using this model , Eq. implies that the magnetic properties in the activation volume are close to the main phase properties, since γ is the main phase domain wall energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. As it was stated in previous coercivity analysis using this model , Eq. implies that the magnetic properties in the activation volume are close to the main phase properties, since γ is the main phase domain wall energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Here k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, M s is the saturation magnetization, and β is an effective demagnetization coefficient. Then, a simple and essential proposal is pointed up in the model : the moment configuration within the nucleus must have necessarily similarities with a magnetic domain wall since a domain wall constitutes the non‐uniform moment configuration of the lowest energy. In that case, E o is assumed to be E o = γ ′ S where γ ′ is the surface energy of the domain formed and S is the surface of the activation volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the micromagnetic simulations reported in Ref. [13] show that defects smaller than 10 nm might be responsible for the reduced coercive field of Nd-Fe-B magnets, although experimental data concerning this matter are still limited in the literature. To obtain further understanding of the impact of lattice imperfections (here: the Nd-rich interphases) on the magnetic properties of Nd-Fe-B-based sintered magnets, an experimental technique which allows one to resolve the nanometer-scale spin microstructure in the bulk of the magnet is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2,3,17 A collective effect of large non-magnetic phases located at the corners of Nd 2 Fe 14 B grains has also been reported for a sintered magnet by computer simulations based on micromagnetic theory. 18 However, these micromagnetic simulations have not clearly determined the effects of the size of the non-magnetic phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%