2017
DOI: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_1_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of decontaminating agents and swipe materials on laboratory simulated working surfaces wet spilled with sodium pertechnetate

Abstract: Context:Decontamination of various working surfaces with sodium pertechnetate minor spillage is essential for maintaining good radiation safety practices as well as for regulatory compliance.Aim:To observe the influences of decontaminating agents and swipe materials on different type of surfaces used in nuclear medicine laboratory work area wet spilled with 99m-technetium (99mTc) sodium pertechnetate.Settings and Design:Lab-simulated working surface materials. Experimental study design.Materials and Methods:Di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high demand for PET scans requires mass production of 18 F-FDG using cyclotron, which indirectly leads to an increase in the incident rate of radionuclide spillage contaminations. Meanwhile, the usage of a large volume of simple decontamination chemical agents might not be sustainable in the environment [7], and is not cost-effective as its periodic purchase is met with limited production. Thus, alternative decontamination agents must be considered by ensuring the application of a competent material for radionuclide decontamination, which is more efficient, environmentally friendly, and economical in terms of long-term usage of the resources [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high demand for PET scans requires mass production of 18 F-FDG using cyclotron, which indirectly leads to an increase in the incident rate of radionuclide spillage contaminations. Meanwhile, the usage of a large volume of simple decontamination chemical agents might not be sustainable in the environment [7], and is not cost-effective as its periodic purchase is met with limited production. Thus, alternative decontamination agents must be considered by ensuring the application of a competent material for radionuclide decontamination, which is more efficient, environmentally friendly, and economical in terms of long-term usage of the resources [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%