2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of cycling frequency and testing volume on the VHCF properties of 18Ni maraging steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fatigue tests were performed with thin sheets made of 18Ni maraging steel with nitrided surfaces [ 16 ]. The chemical composition was (in% mass): Ni 18, Co 5, Mo 5, Al 1, Cr 1 and Fe (balance).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Fatigue tests were performed with thin sheets made of 18Ni maraging steel with nitrided surfaces [ 16 ]. The chemical composition was (in% mass): Ni 18, Co 5, Mo 5, Al 1, Cr 1 and Fe (balance).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since such high numbers of cycles can only be reached with a high-frequency testing technique, ultrasonic fatigue has become a widely used testing technique for VHCF investigations of high-strength steels. An investigation into frequency influences on fatigue properties of high-strength steels was performed with 18Ni maraging steel [16]. Figure 6 shows fatigue data of maraging steel sheet specimens obtained in three testing series: large specimens (testing volume 260 mm 3 ) tested at 95 Hz, small specimens (testing volume 3.4 mm 3 ) tested at 95 Hz, and small specimens tested at 20 kHz.…”
Section: Steelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Generally, 90% risk‐volume have been considered in the literature 17,24,25,34–48 . However, a 95% risk‐volume has been used in Fitzka et al, 49 and in Furuya, 34 VHCF failures have been found for defects outside the 90% risk‐volume, in particular for applied stresses equal to 83% and 88% of the maximum stress. In the latter case, the 90% risk‐volume provides a smaller, thus nonconservative, estimate of the volume to be considered for quantifying size effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%