2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-015-1306-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of curve magnitude and other variables on operative time, blood loss and transfusion requirements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Abstract: Larger preoperative curve magnitudes in AIS increase operative time and intraoperative blood loss; preoperative Cobb angles greater than 70(o) and intraoperative blood loss greater than 1400 ml are predictive of red blood cell transfusion requirement in this patient group.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). Additional predictors of RBC transfusion were a low preoperative Hb concentration, a severe curve magnitude, and an increase in EBL, in accordance with previously published results …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…). Additional predictors of RBC transfusion were a low preoperative Hb concentration, a severe curve magnitude, and an increase in EBL, in accordance with previously published results …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These cutoffs were based on density plots (Fig. ), the 25% quartile value, and the current literature . Sixteen patients (8%) had a preoperative Hb level of no more than 12 g/dL and had 9.26 times higher odds of receiving RBCs compared with the non‐RBC group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[26] Nugent et al, Tarrant et al, and Yu et al clarified that a larger Cobb angle was associated with excessive intraoperative bleeding. [12,27,28] In this study, we observed that blood loss tended to be greater when Cobb angle was larger. This can be explained by the relationship between Cobb angle and surgical complexity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%