2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of curvature on the dynamical susceptibility of bent nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[44][45][46] On the other hand, to simulate the dynamic response of the magnetization (FMR spectra), we have used an a = 0.015. 47,48 In addition, we have used a sinc wave excitation field: 49,50…”
Section: Micromagnetic Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[44][45][46] On the other hand, to simulate the dynamic response of the magnetization (FMR spectra), we have used an a = 0.015. 47,48 In addition, we have used a sinc wave excitation field: 49,50…”
Section: Micromagnetic Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, to simulate the dynamic response of the magnetization (FMR spectra), we have used an α = 0.015. 47,48 In addition, we have used a sinc wave excitation field: 49,50 , applied along the y -direction to perturb the magnetization of the system. The amplitude of the sinc wave was h 0 = 1 mT, the cut-off frequency f c = 50 GHz and τ = t − t 0 was the simulation time ( t ), with an offset t 0 .…”
Section: Micromagnetic Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…max 0 [60,61], where the amplitude is h 0 = 1 mT, and the cut-off frequency is f = 40 GHz. The time evolution of the magnetization is sampled every 10 ps, during a total time of 20 ns.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, to simulate the dynamic response of magnetization (FMR spectra), we used α = 0.015 [ 59 ]. In addition, we applied a sinc wave excitation field [ 51 ] along the y -direction to perturb the magnetization of the system. The sinc function is a mathematical function used to describe the spectral response of a low-pass filter or the pulse response of a sampling system.…”
Section: Micromagnetic Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salazar-Cardona et al [ 50 ] proposed a device based on coplanar waveguides that would selectively measure the exchange or dipole-induced spin wave nonreciprocities. Recently, some of us analyzed the dynamic susceptibility of curved permalloy nanotubes [ 51 ] and permalloy wire-tube nanostructures [ 52 ]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies that systematically investigate the static and dynamic properties of Fe 3 O 4 nanotubes, despite the high aspect ratio being conducive to electron conduction and further increasing the conduction loss capability [ 53 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%