“…The field-blended rubber asphalt showed a good performance in terms of permanent deformation and fatigue determined in the (Neto et al, 2006) Figure 2.5. Crumb rubber particles obtained by ambient grinding (left) and cryogenic grinding (right) (Neto et al, 2006) Figure 2.6. Continuous blend rubber asphalt (left) and terminal blend rubber asphalt (right) (Fontes et al, 2006) (Hwee & Tanaka, 1993) (Sekaran, 1988) Table 2.3 -Natural rubber specifications -NBR 11597 Table 2.4 -Chemical composition of a light vehicle (passenger car) tire (Shulman, 2008) Table 2.5 -Chemical composition of a light/ heavy vehicle tires (Shulman, 2008) Table 3.1 -Physical properties of the neat, rubber asphalt and SBS binders Table 3.2 -Stress sensitivity parameter (Jnr, diff) for the neat, rubber asphalt, and SBS binders Table 3.3 -Results of the Time Sweep Tests for the neat, rubber asphalt, and SBS binders at 20°C and 10 Hz Table 3.4 -Model inputs for the LAS test for the neat and modified binders Table 4.1 -Physical properties of the neat and CRM binders Table 4.2 -Grain size distribution curve for the RJ-122 test section Table 4.3 -Volumetric properties of the field-blended rubber asphalt mixture Table 4.4 -Average rut-depths under the f-sAPT test section Table 5.1 -Physical properties of the neat and CRM binders Table 5.2 -Grain size distribution curve for the RJ-122 test section Table 5.3 -Volumetric properties of the field-blended rubber asphalt mixture Table 5.4 -Results of the Time Sweep Tests for the neat and rubber modified binders at 20°C and 10 Hz Table 5.5 -Model inputs for the LAS test for the neat and rubber asphalt binders Table 5.6 -Fatigue laws for the field and laboratory-compacted specimens of the field-blended rubber asphalt mixture Table 6.1 -Grain size distribution curve for the RJ-122 test section Table 6.2 -Grain size distribution curve for the crumb rubber modifier along with ADOT specifications Table 6.3 -Physical properties of the conventional bin...…”