1991
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8502(91)90001-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of cross-flow on particle collection characteristics of multi-nozzle impactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the samplers investigated in this study, however, have multiple round nozzles, with the Millipore Air Tester having as many as 1,000 nozzles. Although it is generally assumed that calculations for a single-nozzle design can be directly applied to multiple nozzle impactors, some studies indicate that cross-flow from neighboring jets influences the particle collection efficiency (Sethuraman and Hickey 2001;Fang et al 1991).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the samplers investigated in this study, however, have multiple round nozzles, with the Millipore Air Tester having as many as 1,000 nozzles. Although it is generally assumed that calculations for a single-nozzle design can be directly applied to multiple nozzle impactors, some studies indicate that cross-flow from neighboring jets influences the particle collection efficiency (Sethuraman and Hickey 2001;Fang et al 1991).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on their studies with MOUDI impactor, Fang et al (1991) recommended that their-derived cross-flow parameter should be below 1.2. Among the investigated portable samplers, the MAS-100 and the SAS Super 180 had cross-flow parameter of 1.06.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this single-nozzle design eliminates the multiple jet interaction problems, 7 particle bounce of particles larger than the cut point was found to be significant. Also, as with the previously described system, this impactor has a 2.1-mm cut point, which is lower than that of the Federal Reference Method (FRM) (2.5 µm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Nearly all the theoretical work and much of the experimental work have been conducted on single nozzle impactors. The results of single-nozzle impactor analysis have often been applied to multinozzle impactors which are assumed to act as a group of individual nozzles (Fang et al 1991;Kwon et al 2002). However, this approach ignores an important fact that the interaction between the flows from adjacent nozzles can change the fluid mechanics in the impaction region, the location of the jet stagnation points, and the impaction characteristics of each nozzle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach ignores an important fact that the interaction between the flows from adjacent nozzles can change the fluid mechanics in the impaction region, the location of the jet stagnation points, and the impaction characteristics of each nozzle. The particle collection efficiency was found to be influenced by the cross flow (Fang et al 1991) and nozzle arrangement (Kwon et al 2002). Moreover, the effect of the S/W ratio on the cutoff characteristics of the multinozzle impactors (i.e., micro-orifice impactors) has been studied (Gudmundsson et al 1995;Kwon et al 2002;Yao and Mainelis 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%