2007
DOI: 10.3133/sir20075164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Cougar Reservoir Drawdown on Sediment and DDT Transport and Deposition in the McKenzie River Basin, Oregon, Water Years 2002-04

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S4). Th is period of elevated concentrations coincided with the refi lling of Cougar Reservoir following the drawdown period to modify the withdrawal structure (Anderson, 2007). Hypothesized eff ects of the reservoir drawdown and construction project that may have increased downstream DBP precursor concentrations included (i) release of OM from oxidized sediments and/or decomposing vegetation that grew on the exposed bed material during the drawdown period that was inundated when the reservoir was refi lled, and/or (ii) increases in DOM inputs from reservoir planktonic algal production in epilimnetic (10 to 20 m) water that was released to meet downstream temperature criteria.…”
Section: Watershed Trihalomethane and Haloacetic Acid Precursorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S4). Th is period of elevated concentrations coincided with the refi lling of Cougar Reservoir following the drawdown period to modify the withdrawal structure (Anderson, 2007). Hypothesized eff ects of the reservoir drawdown and construction project that may have increased downstream DBP precursor concentrations included (i) release of OM from oxidized sediments and/or decomposing vegetation that grew on the exposed bed material during the drawdown period that was inundated when the reservoir was refi lled, and/or (ii) increases in DOM inputs from reservoir planktonic algal production in epilimnetic (10 to 20 m) water that was released to meet downstream temperature criteria.…”
Section: Watershed Trihalomethane and Haloacetic Acid Precursorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When regression models are developed with data that violate assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity, the models are less likely to apply over the range of expected conditions for the site, and large prediction errors may occur. Rasmussen and others (2009) recommend log transformations for development of estimated suspended sediment concentrations and loads as a function of continuous turbidity and (or) discharge data, and this approach has been used with success for suspended sediment and other selected variables in streams in Kansas (Rasmussen and others, 2008), Oregon (Uhrich and Bragg, 2003;Anderson, 2007), and Florida (Lietz and Debiak, 2005).…”
Section: Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, log transformation can introduce a bias that needs to be corrected. Duan's Bias Correction Factor (Duan, 1983), or BCF, which converts the logarithmic residuals from the regression process into normal space and then averages them, has been used frequently in recent studies (Uhrich and Bragg, 2003;Anderson, 2007;Rasmussen and others, 2008) and is used by the USGS as part of a national protocol for surrogate prediction by regression models (Rasmussen and others, 2009). Other steps in the maintenance of data and regression modeling include graphical evaluation of the relations between independent and dependent variables (for example, figure 5), removal of outliers (if careful attempts to resolve them were unsuccessful), and evaluation of residuals for homoscedasticity (constant variance across the range of data; Rasmussen and others, 2009).…”
Section: Model Development and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is effectively reservoir flushing, and may be accompanied by a washout of sediments (Schenk & Bragg, ) as well as other fish species. Although there is some history of draining for passage and dam maintenance (Anderson, ), this strategy has not previously been evaluated for short‐ and longer‐term impacts to the reservoir community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%