46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2008
DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-1306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Control on the Pitch Damping of a Floating Wind Turbine

Abstract: This paper presents the influence of conventional wind turbine blade-pitch control actions on the pitch damping of a wind turbine supported by an offshore floating barge with catenary moorings. There was a concern that the drop in steady-state wind turbine rotor thrust with wind speed above rated would lead to negative damping of the barge-pitch mode and contribute to the large system-pitch motions. It is demonstrated that neither the addition of a control loop through feedback of tower-top acceleration nor th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
112
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
112
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The task of damping tower oscillations was addressed by [6], suggesting an influence of tower acceleration on blade pitch control. A linear quadratic regulator (LQR) was applied to a floating wind turbine in [7,8], which showed improved results in power stability and tower oscillations compared to [5]. Other, similar studies have been published in [9,10], e.g., [9] also used LQR on a floating wind turbine and presented error and platform motion reduction at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The task of damping tower oscillations was addressed by [6], suggesting an influence of tower acceleration on blade pitch control. A linear quadratic regulator (LQR) was applied to a floating wind turbine in [7,8], which showed improved results in power stability and tower oscillations compared to [5]. Other, similar studies have been published in [9,10], e.g., [9] also used LQR on a floating wind turbine and presented error and platform motion reduction at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In [5], a gain scheduled proportional integrating (GSPI) controller showed good performance regarding tower oscillations, but overshoots rated power and generator speed, which may reduce the generator lifetime. The task of damping tower oscillations was addressed by [6], suggesting an influence of tower acceleration on blade pitch control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this approach was proved suitable for applying the gross wind turbine loads, further process for incorporating the effect of turbine control on the global dynamic response of the FOWT is impossible. As shown in the works of [15] and [23], the wind turbine control is closely related to the integral dynamic responses of a given FOWT system. Over the last several years, the University of Maine has collaborated with the Maritime Research Institute Netherland (MARIN) basin in conducting a sequence of Froude-scaled model tests for spar-type, semi-submersible-type, and TLP-type floating wind turbines [18][19][20] that were 1:50 geometrically scaled from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 5 MW reference wind turbine [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These introduce an inverse-response behavior due to the interaction of the fore-aft motion with the control, which results in a "negative damping" of the FOWT system. This has been described in [22] for conventional single-input-singleoutput (SISO) control and recently in [23] for an improved behavior using more control inputs than the rotor speed error. Another example of advanced controllers for FOWTs using wind preview information is [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%