2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of collisional parameters for rough particles on simulation of a gas-fluidized bed using a two-fluid model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Closer to the gas-solid interface, the particle volume fraction decreases more sharply. This shows that the splash zone formed by the collapse of bubbles is a small area, which is consistent with previous studies [29,30]. The result from Figure 16 shows that the restitution coefficient had little effect on the axial profile of the jetsam volume fraction.…”
Section: Distribution Of Particle Volume Fractionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Closer to the gas-solid interface, the particle volume fraction decreases more sharply. This shows that the splash zone formed by the collapse of bubbles is a small area, which is consistent with previous studies [29,30]. The result from Figure 16 shows that the restitution coefficient had little effect on the axial profile of the jetsam volume fraction.…”
Section: Distribution Of Particle Volume Fractionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As further proof, the effective specularity coefficient is calculated to be ϕ ≈ 0.046 for β w = 0 and ϕ ≈ 0.053 for β w = 1. However, the influence of β w on this Couette flow seems to be slight, yet previous studies , have also shown that the collisional parameters, except for the tangential restitution coefficient, could have a profound influence on the gas-particle fluidization behavior.…”
Section: Numerical Tests and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Thus, unlike β w , μ w is much more sensitive in the present model. The sensitivity of μ w has also been demonstrated in the modeling of a bubbling fluidized bed …”
Section: Numerical Tests and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In bubbling fluidized beds, where the collision frequency between the particles is high, the effects of solid closures have been studied for example by Passalacqua et al (2009) and Farzaneh et al (2015) who examined the effect of frictional stress models. Zhao et al (2015) investigated the influence of collisional parameters, and Patil et al (2005a) studied the effects of the solid phase viscosity models. On circulating fluidized beds, the drag force between the gas and solid phases is widely considered to dominate the fluidization process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%