2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0926-860x(99)00334-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of coke deactivation and vanadium and nickel contamination on the performance of low ZSM-5 levels in FCC catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vanadium and nickel have been shown to exhibit dissimilar behaviors on contact with the FCC catalyst [2] . For instance, vanadium, in the presence of steam, at high temperature, causes dealumination of framework aluminum, destruction of zeolite crystallinity and collapse of zeolite structure [3][4][5][6][7][8] . On the con-trary, dealumination and/or catalyst framework destruction caused by Ni is insignificant compared with V, but Ni acts as a catalyst for dehydrogenation reaction, thereby promoting coking and shifting the selectivity away from the desired cracked product(s) [9] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vanadium and nickel have been shown to exhibit dissimilar behaviors on contact with the FCC catalyst [2] . For instance, vanadium, in the presence of steam, at high temperature, causes dealumination of framework aluminum, destruction of zeolite crystallinity and collapse of zeolite structure [3][4][5][6][7][8] . On the con-trary, dealumination and/or catalyst framework destruction caused by Ni is insignificant compared with V, but Ni acts as a catalyst for dehydrogenation reaction, thereby promoting coking and shifting the selectivity away from the desired cracked product(s) [9] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The n-hexane activity is indeed lower compared to the commercial ZSM-5 [22] zeolite and remains similar to deactivated ZSM-5 [32], including the reference ZSM-5 (Ref. [1]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…2, high light olefin yield in our results is also reflected by the relatively low C 4 paraffin-to-C 4 olefin ratios and high hydrogen-to-methane ratios for highly contaminated ECat-HIGH catalyst compared to relatively less contaminated ECat-LOW catalyst. Wallenstein et al [16] also reported higher olefin yields for the metallated catalysts. In their study, after catalysts were impregnated with vanadium and nickel catalysts were exposed to 30 cycles of oxidizing and reducing atmosphere at 788 • C. The higher olefin yields for metallated catalysts compared to non-metallated catalyst was attributed to the dehydrogenation activity of vanadium and nickel [16].…”
Section: Hydrogen Transfer Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Wallenstein et al [16] also reported higher olefin yields for the metallated catalysts. In their study, after catalysts were impregnated with vanadium and nickel catalysts were exposed to 30 cycles of oxidizing and reducing atmosphere at 788 • C. The higher olefin yields for metallated catalysts compared to non-metallated catalyst was attributed to the dehydrogenation activity of vanadium and nickel [16]. Both hydrogen and methane used as pretreatment gases in this study have the ability to reduce metal oxides on the catalysts.…”
Section: Hydrogen Transfer Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 92%